And to emphasise my perspective, it’s harmful to supply “airtime without criticism” - that stunt drew attention to a sharp critique. It hijacked what would have otherwise been a notable occasion regardless. And as a minor side effect, the event highlighted the party’s fragility.

What does that even mean?

I suspect it’s a reaction to “multicultural”. Their demand isn’t a cohesive vision, it’s a tantrum.

I missed the news of it.

Hanson demands a homocultural nation.

Fair call, promotion wasn’t the best word. What I meant to say was, they give her airtime without criticism - I’d say that’s a form of support, for a similar reason to your concern about giving her attention. Even if we’re talking about cases where the reporting is neutral, factual and with minimal bias, it’s still selected and reported on regularly, and that shapes the worldview of the audience, especially if the heavily-flawed ideas Hanson espouses aren’t addressed in the reporting. Repeating their messages verbatim through a megaphone is spreading their ideas - outlets almost never do the same with open neo-Nazis’ speeches, for obvious reasons.

And as is common knowledge, there are additionally some mass media favourably promoting PHON, like Sky News, who have already called this event a “failed stunt” (lol)

For the most part, yes.

Voting for a representative every four years is not democracy, in any meaningful sense. The AEC is outstanding compared to other countries, I hold them in high regard and I am grateful, but we cannot pretend that people and their needs have more political influence than capital.

and the media are just. Cool. Our turn!

and this makes plenty of sense once we inspect the owning shareholders of media corporations. Protip: it’s owning-class ultrawealthy parasites, same as in the USA

I do have to question if that is giving her more attention, eg. “interrupted by protest banner” vs “Pauline Hanson’s press club address” really what we want?

PHON is not a problem that can just be ignored, considering that capitalist mass media is constantly promoting her and the party is regularly claiming polls and some election results of >20%. We are past the era of denying attention. If we’re lucky, we’re still in the era of education and inoculation against their propaganda.

If news outlets are going to promote her on the big stage no matter what, let’s mock her on that big stage.

While espionage and conspiracy are real aspects of politics, Mossad being a known perpetrator, we must also be careful to not trivialise the material political interest that Western countries have in supporting the Zionist Regime. We’re not making weapons and weapon components for them just because some people are being extorted. This is imperialism for resources.

As for the Epstein part, this is important and somewhat relevant: Origins of the Epstein Class

Well, Zoo magazine wasn’t where I expected to find neo-fascist propaganda, but in hindsight maybe I shouldn’t have been surprised.

When asked if his role was elected or appointed, he said “none of your business so bugger off”.

Democracy in action, folks.

I’m pretty deep in redneck Queensland so that might have a bit to do with it.

Maybe so. I also know a couple of likely-suspects (Faux/Sky News fans) who are open, paying members, insisting they’re trying to preserve for their grandchildren the world that allowed them to live well and make millions.

An area near me has a huge Lib/Lab council facing intense scrutiny for developer corruption. If we don’t work year-round to build a viable, trustworthy support network, these people will be vulnerable to PHON selective messaging to seize upon anti-establishment sentiment (remember folks, billionaires and private media don’t count!)

To all the people reading this - they have money and media infrastructure. We have numbers and neighbours. And without you and your friends, we have less numbers and less neighbours. If you care enough to click, you care enough to get involved.

I respond with a hearty “bollocks” to all your statements.

I am enthusiastically curious about why you claim that the curing of children’s cancer being beneficial is “bollocks”.

The “but they’re working on curing children’s cancer!!!1!” is just an emotional hook to generate moral outrage. There are plenty of PhDs getting 18 an hour researching weapons systems, but they don’t make the news.

The first of those jobs is constructive and beneficial to both Australia and to humankind as a whole. The second is destructive and literally helps kill people. It’s invalid to trivialise that difference down to “moral outrage” - in fact morality need not be involved at all - health research is a vital job I’d like to see rewarded better.

Detained by the IDF and QPS! Ridiculous speech restriction…

and ferry

Keelhaul the kiddos!

Some of our trains have quiet carriages, which are nice. I haven’t been on many but I haven’t seen them noisy either.

Tom Tanuki made a video about this, in particular about the e-celeb grifters patting themselves on the back for this “genius” idea.

But the sad thing is, I think political consciousness right now is so low that a significant amount of people could conceivably give votes to parties just based on their ballot name.

Oh, that’s Michael J. Nelson (child sex advocate and weird neo-Nazi)

[content warning on that video: nazism and associated grooming]

Great to hear, thanks for sharing. I always love some good CSIRO news.

Yep, well said.

The (comical) British understatement is absolutely dripping off the translations. “Leave whenever you like”, oh my.