• 42 Posts
  • 631 Comments
Joined 2 年前
cake
Cake day: 2024年7月24日

help-circle

  • I’m pretty deep in redneck Queensland so that might have a bit to do with it.

    Maybe so. I also know a couple of likely-suspects (Faux/Sky News fans) who are open, paying members, insisting they’re trying to preserve for their grandchildren the world that allowed them to live well and make millions.

    An area near me has a huge Lib/Lab council facing intense scrutiny for developer corruption. If we don’t work year-round to build a viable, trustworthy support network, these people will be vulnerable to PHON selective messaging to seize upon anti-establishment sentiment (remember folks, billionaires and private media don’t count!)


    To all the people reading this - they have money and media infrastructure. We have numbers and neighbours. And without you and your friends, we have less numbers and less neighbours. If you care enough to click, you care enough to get involved.











  • Speaking of McDonalds, I seriously don’t understand those still eating in in this day and age. It’s overpriced pseudo-food. There is no benefit. I’d rather eat a decade-old military ration, or a plain block of tofu.

    The only times I’ve even considered it in the past ten years are in a group of inebriated friends leaving a club/party who all want to eat, plus every other shop in walking distance is closed because it’s midnight








  • If we make it a prerequisite to vote that ones need to be able to answer some extremely basic questions about the election they’re voting in, all of those questions being given months ahead of time, along with all the answers, then (barring profound mental conditions) not qualifying to vote is a choice. If you’re informed enough to know where the polling booth is, you’re probably capable of passing that bar. Based on your reply, you’d pass with flying colours.

    If someone is so apathetic that they don’t know the absolute basic premise of a given election, what is the benefit of allowing them to vote in it?

    Of course, and I didn’t emphasise this enough, the system I’m proposing relies heavily on the ability for the election organisers, through tools such as the government and law, to empower every possible voter to understand the basic premise of the election. And in a sea of corporate-owned media (both traditional and online), this is easier said than done, but far from impossible.

    I think everyone deserves to be given the tools they need to have real political power. That’s demo-cracy.



  • A 3 question civics test before you can vote would destroy whole blocs of voters in Australia. Just get them to identify how a progressive income tax works, which country is the biggest greenhouse gas emitter in the OECD, and which parts of the Miranda Rights apply to them, boom PHON gets a dozen votes across the whole country.

    Having some kind of extremely-low barrier, pre-declared multiple-choice test questions in order to gain ballot access is an idea I’ve played around with. Literally mail out a pamphlet with the questions and answers, drafted by the AEC and approved by as many candidates/parties as possible to prevent it being unneutral or propagandised. Objective things like “Which of these services does the federal government handle?” and “Which of these is the typical income of an average Australian?”. And if, for whatever reason, you can’t answer these simple questions, you aren’t informed enough to help decide who represents us in our democratic system.

    Relevant, but not quite the same: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epistemic_democracy