Don’t question corporations forcing people to come into an office to work on a computer all day.

I’m willing to bet they would cache the garbage ai summary… not that that makes a difference to your overall point.

The ai garbage at the top doesn’t stop you from doing that.

On the one hand, it’s insulting to expect people to write entries for free only to have AI just summarize the text and have users never actually read those written words.

On the other hand, the future is people copying the url into chat gpt and asking for a summary.

The future is bleak either way.

Thanks! It’s been so long since I left Reddit that I forgot this one.

I’m gonna pretend to be an ice agent and go into a McDonald’s and order a McFlurry and pay for my it and say thank you and eat in the lobby and clean up my mess and leave and never mention I’m an ice agent.

Flag code aside, people who deify the American flag over the rights and welfare of human beings should spend a year in jail.

Flags are just things. Burn ‘em, wave ‘em, tattoo them on your buttcheek. I don’t care. It’s not more important than the human beings being treated like garbage.

I will remain doubtful until actual evidence comes out.

The example they gave was somebody noticing the name on the ballot didn’t match what they chose on the screen. I don’t know about others, but I always look at the ballot before putting it in the box. If I noticed Trump’s name, I absolutely would have said something.

If they are implying this happened on such a massive scale that Trump would have actually lost (120k in PA alone), then I guarantee this issue would have been noticed by a much higher percentage of people and would have been all over the news on Election Day.

Besides, I think exit polling generally matched up with the results.

Expand deliciously

Would we have beat the nazis if they just stayed in Germany?

Yeah, this makes sense. I wasn’t exactly thinking about the impacts of current events on the future, and that playing into how things are remembered, but that’s a good point.

I think part of what I was getting at is that history is often blurred by memories of the events and the limited media and reporting that stood the test of time. A narrative will form and there will be limited amounts of stats that contradict it.

This aspect will be different going forward. The memory is less relevant since we have an overwhelming amount of media and reporting that lives on. And we also have massive amounts of first hand video footage that.

Maybe history will just be defined by who creates the best narrative out of this massive amount of data. And people will still ignore the contradicting evidence. It happens in real time anyway.

Side bar: I don’t think the way “history” remembers current events matters anymore. The way news spreads and is remembered is so different now than it was in 1965 that I don’t think history will view our current time that much differently than we did. Just my theory.

Where’s your pillow Timmy?

They honestly need to look at Fortnite as the model. It wasn’t meant to be this massive AAA game. It was a modest game with a unique concept (building). Adding battle royal was done on a whim. It just happened to click with millions of people.

Still, the feds will come after the individuals, not the state.

They were using the Japanese version of excel

Is Newsom a garbage person, a slimy politician with no real core beliefs, who just tight rope walks a balance between the desires of his constituents, and his wealthy donors?

Yes

Got any good news articles about this? I don’t see much about him except his podcast and headlines like these. But nothing ever dives into who he actually is and some might call him a “garbage person”.

I did want to comment about this YouTube video because I think so many people heard the specific clip she played and literally nothing else and formed their opinion.

I get that hardcore democrats take issue with him saying that the trans athlete issue is an issue of fairness. But I think his opinion represented the majority of Americans right now. So agree or disagree, but this is not a fringe opinion.

Furthermore, she cut off the podcast right after he says “There’s also a humility and a grace”. I think it’s important to point out the full quote because he is absolutely not against trans people. He sees them as people and cares about them and their feelings. Charlie Kirk and JK Rowling do not see them as people. This is a difference worth pointing out.

Maybe he would not handle trans athletes exactly the way you want, but he would absolutely try to handle them in a way that is compassionate to them. He talks more about trans students later that I found interesting.

No, so let me step back. Say completely fair on the issue of fairness. I completely agree. So that’s easy to call out, the unfairness of that.

There’s also a humility and a grace that these poor people are more likely to commit suicide, have anxiety and depression.

And the way that people talk down to vulnerable communities is an issue that I have a hard time with as well. So both things I can hold in my hand. How can we address this issue with the kind of decency that I think, you know, is inherent in you, but not always expressed on the issue?

Charlie Kirk proceeded to ignore this comment. I will say as much as Newsom did not push back as much as I would have, I still ended this podcast recognizing how much Kirk suuuuuuucks. I had no idea who he was before, but I’m glad I have this reference now.

It is interesting that Superman’s archenemy was an incredibly wealthy businessman. That seems to be the exact problem with our world today (there’s just many more of them).

You can disagree with “platforming” all you want, but that still doesn’t make him “not a democrat”. And you can point out a couple areas where he might not agree with many democrats (but not all), but that still doesn’t disqualify him from being a democrat. It just recognizes that the Democratic Party has more variety in beliefs than places like Reddit and Lemmy would want you to believe.

These people that he is talking to don’t need “platforming”. They already have a large enough platform without him. And the fact that democrats lost to Trump this time around should be enough to recognize that their messages are resonating in some way.

And your instinct (as well as mine) is to shut that message down with strong debate and fact checking. The only thing this will accomplish is ending the conversation. Sure, Sam Seder would destroy Steve Bannon, but that’s exactly why they aren’t having that debate. And as a result, we will never hear their message and will never understand what about that message is actually resonating with voters. But the message will continue to resonate nonetheless.

Newsom lets them talk, lightly pushes back or looks for common ground, but does not attempt to invalidate them. As a listener, I gain a better understanding of who these people are and why people are still voting for Trump. I recognize their flaws without needing Newsom to point them out.

I digress… none of this makes me think he is not a democrat. He may disagree with other democrats on some issues, but that’s allowed. That’s why they have debates. You got a list of reasons why Newsom is not a democrat, I’d love to hear it.