I’d be genuinely surprised to hear that anyone thought otherwise

I even got one from the service I use for my therapy practice, which I thought was kinda neat but mostly off-putting. It included how many documented minutes of therapy I did this year, percentage that was virtual vs in-person, etc.

This is true, OP. Prank each therapist to see how they react, and if they react poorly then you know they’re a bad therapist

Probably libs upset about seeing the Dems labeled a terrorist org

I’m 100% trying the World’s Greatest Breakfast at the earliest opportunity, thank you for sharing

Or from the back of a stranger’s van in a parking lot 🤌

Removed by mod

I feel like I’m going crazy here. Please share what I said that comes across as hitlerite and, if you wouldn’t mind, explain why?

I realize this will probably come across like sealioning but I’m genuinely so confused. I’m a vegan, an anarchist, and a social worker therapist. I’m being sincere here

I’ve been doing that each time I reply and I’m still baffled. I wasn’t being rhetorical when I said I think there’s a fundamental misunderstanding, but I’m beginning to question whether that misunderstanding is actually not on my part as I had original suspected

But that’s literally the view that it is being used to support.

No it’s not

You don’t see how “I’ve decided based on traits inherent to their birth that this being doesn’t deserve to live” could trigger alarms relating to racism?

I realize that speciesism is similar to racism. I made a whole zine about that in college. But you can’t just entirely conflate them- that feels even more racist

Literally what is happening here?

??? It doesn’t inherently mean it’s okay to kill the other. And what does race have to do with it?

If someone asked me whether I’d rather save a person of color or a white person- I have no rational preference, so I’d pass. Boring question.

This is about different species though. E.g., the parent comment posed a bunch of cows vs a kitten. If I could save a bunch of cows by killing a kitten, I’d do it. Now you and I have just learned something about my values, and I think that’s neat.

Then we really get into moral dilemmas with human vs non-human. I know the trolley problem is controversial, but it’s a genuinely great way to explore values. If I had to choose between killing 1 cow or 1 person, I’d choose the cow. But what about several cows? If a genie popped up and told me I could magically make the whole world vegan, but one random human would die a sudden tragic death, I’d make that deal. Where’s my line though? There must be a specific number at which I switch from sparing the human to sacrificing the human. These questions are about discovering those boundaries for yourself, and I don’t think that’s bad

Sorry, genuinely asking- how does the framing inevitably lead to white supremacist views?

I personally enjoy these sorts of thought experiments / hypotheticals to explore my values. Of course, I don’t use them in debates or as some sort of “gotcha”

It’s also strange, to me, seeing idealism shat on here

I feel like I must be missing something and fundamentally misunderstanding your point

/s (as in serious)

Seriously!

Reminded me of this clip (sorry for tiktok link- enable desktop mode to view in mobile browser)

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8UprEej/

Lmao 10/10 comment

I’m randomly taking comments from the OP of this post and ham fisting them into contexts that result in the word salad you’ve been witnessing 😅

Awe <3 It’s not you- the layers are absurd! This whole post and my comments are primarily a parody of this

Sorry <3 I’m just parodying this person