I’m not trying to cause a stir here, but is this not a typical behavior even for many Americans or Westerners too where they do an ancestry test to find out omg I am 1% Estonian time to become the top poster on r/Estonia and talk about how amazing it is now that they got Freedom™ (even though they don’t live there)

I suppose it could also be an element of fear where someone feels like they have to be 200% racist towards their own people or their new home will never accept them.

Have you never played a video game? If you capture enemy flag the color of the country changes and everyone supports you now. That’s how this works.

This video feels like traveling to my grandparents generation when they were in their 20’s. Even the way the video opens up by the guy being humble and admitting he’s not a communist, because he lacks the will and ability. I really hope they succeed where we failed.

In just a decades our town managed to develop self-sustaining electricity, food, housing for everyone, central heating, jobs, they were working on renewable energy sources already. With modern technology they should be able to develop even faster that’s amazing.

Are they actually doing something or is it like here where they open up “bases” with rusty tractors in them as equipment while the syphon the money into yachts

Hexbear probably won’t be able to create enough of a superstructure to change the material conditions we live in, so as much as we can clap ourselves it is important to remember that we’re all influenced by our surrounding conditions, there are a lot of things I simply don’t say because it’s not the time and place. Lying isn’t a bad thing, it’s about how you use it.

It’s easy to start taking victories for granted and eventually fall into dogmatism, once you stop questioning why things changed.

The big question is what do you do with all those songs telling you to fuck the government and telling kids to stay out of school once you become the government and make education compulsory.

That’s probably why these songs are allowed to be popular and circulate around so much.

Apologies if this was too complicated.

I mean: In order to know if it’s okay to do a <thing> to a individual you have to ask them for consent. Every time yes, every time.

If this process is too bothersome and you want to simplify it, you have to create a rules based society where everyone knows and is taught the rules.

The obvious issue, that stands out, is not everyone might want to be like you, so what do you do with them? What do you do if someone doesn’t want to flirt or be courted? Some women might like being cat called, for instance, I don’t like that.

Now I want to tell the person to fuck themselves in response? am I allowed to do that? Or should I be polite? What if I don’t mind being told “Screw you B***h” but I hate flirting? So how’s that fair that he can flirt with me and I can’t insult him?

The big question, the antithesis to the poster is - A individual who wants long-term relationships acquired through flirting , but just like the poster won’t disclose this upfront

But the poster, the thesis, - A individual who wants short-term relationship acquired though flirting , but **won’t disclose it upfront. **

Common aspects: Flirting, Not disclosing their intentions

Clashing interests: Wants short term play, Wants a long term relationship.

Definitions: Relationship = The interaction cultivated between two individuals. Long term = Not infinite, could be a week, could end up being 10 years, 40 years etc. Shot term = Right now, not concerned with the future developments.

Individual = someone who made their own choice, regardless if there is or isn’t a collective rule that’s supposed to be followed. It could be aligned or misaligned.

But I’m not getting paid for this so you get shitty ass temu discount teacher.

You want to flirt with someone, there’s bound to be people who want to be courted, but if there’s explicit consent then the relationship between the Flirter and the Flirted on crumbles, because the thrill is in either being dominated or dominating others. This relationship dynamic is impossible to resolve, at best you can create a 3rd space where you let people consent to non-consensual acts.

That is an application of Dialectical materialism.

Something people forget about is figures like Lenin, Mao, Che, Stalin. People like Inessa Fyodorovna Armand. These people chose the path of severe hardships.

They didn’t just lead the people, they sometimes begged for survival themselves, Gramsci was born with severe disabilities and literally spent most of his life writing in a prison, Stalin went in and out of work camp several times. Lenin was shaving his beard and coming up with fake identities to hide himself as people were out for his head, Armand overworked herself to death.

You don’t need to look so far back in history. Do you know about Huang Wenxiu? I’m assuming on Hexbear some people would, but people like her seem to be almost completely out of Western leftist consciousness. Because these kinds of organization efforts are illegal. It’s illegal to do mass organizing for actually helping people, at best it’s anarchism which operates so disjointly by the time they build 1 hospital bed a - political party could have built 1 whole hospital with trained staff.

No way they’re actually treating this as a game of Civ and in the room you have the boss man who’s looking at the screen doing thumbs up or down while his henchmen are running around like in that spongebob episode in the brain they’re running around the cabinet panicking, you know what I’m talkin about right?

Meanwhile, if I was elected and tried to Fix a pot hole I’d get stabbed in the back.

You could think of it like this:

There’s

• politically aware, unaware, active inactive members of society,
• then there’s those who try to lead people, those who follow instructions and those who observe, those who try to learn, those who imitate etc.
• the ones who communicate things in-between.

Then there’s problems of our societies, the contradictions, class struggles.

What are the problems? Who is attending the rallies? who is leading them? who isn’t attending them? why do they attend them? why don’t they? Who is delivering the messages, what means are they using? If it’s the internet who is browsing the internet?

What would be the interests of a crowd that’s gathered on a workday during work hours? what’s their age? Is there a better way we could communicate? Are there people who we could draw to join? Are the organizers deliberately avoiding certain demographics of people? why? How could we get those inactive observers to join us? Is there a way we could survey people and direct those letters towards organizers? Perhaps people are too scared to speak their mind so what can we do there to get the point across? I could go on, but this is the sort of questions we have to ask.

It’s tough. There will be clashing interests, all sots of stuff.

ideally if you’re organizing for socialism you’d want a crowd that turns their head around and yells at you about their real problems that aren’t being addressed and you’d know what to do, but this is seemingly not happening, there’s a problem, are these people really socialists or are they here out of sympathy for the victims and their heart hurt? could they be turned into socialists? what stops them from it? Who are you and what do you want? Those are the questions all of us should be asking.

They should set aside their differences and fight the true villain. J.K Rowler in her castle of mold

The entire world order can’t defeat Iran? Excellent news.

"It is evident that to read too many books is harmful. " - Mao Zedong

That’s what he would say if he saw this conversation probably lol

It seems like modern warfare is basically just “my drones strike your drones” and if either side has drones free to not strike other drones, they can instantly kill whoever they like.

It’s a lot more complex than that. Modern warfare is Asymmetrical warfare. Economic, Military, Moral. Key aspect in maintaining imperialism is keeping labor aristocracy happy, presenting the military as a force for good, giving everyone treats. You’re not wrong that it’s a paper tiger, but enough consciousness has to manifest for people to see it’s a paper tiger. Like come on even libs have to realize if their country could win WW3 and dominate the world they’d have already done it. They know they can’t win.

Heaven - A state of eternal bliss. Absence of struggle.

Hell - A state of eternal struggle. Absence of meaning.

Outer hell - Gateway into hell, for those running away from meaning, seeking to purely live with no thoughts.

Outer heaven - Gateway into heaven, for those who choose their struggle, knowing they won’t ever see the fruits of their labor.

Then there’s the people who see this and try to carve a 3rd way, because they see that there’s nothing at the end of both paths. Except there is no 3rd path, all they’re doing is desperately clinging onto now and re-shaping currently existing bounds of knowledge, afraid to learn something new. They’re obsessed with replicating. See how they treat concepts like infinity, dimensions, they think that you can predict a “4D” cube just by studying the relationships between 1,2,3 dimensions. All they’re doing is stirring up soup, they’re not making anything new. The further humanity moves, the more collective effort is requires to discover something new. The more difficult it is to organize and the more power each individual has the more people will be trying to destroy you, because they don’t want to move forward. So the only way to progress is to establish a group of people who aren’t afraid to face it to the end, together, against all odds.

When you work really hard and you do it for yourself, you’re moving mountains.

When you work really hard for others, you’re blowing feathers.

It makes no sense for us to be stepping on each other’s necks. This anecdote is another proof, shame it’s an exception and not the rule.

I’m overly simplifying here, but I have a hypothesis that the underclasses created by a hierarchical society are forced to engage in the most struggle, struggle is where all knowledge originates form, even if the underclasses do mange to crawl to the top they will only ever be allowed in the outer rim of “Heaven”, not inside Heaven itself. And this leads to a paradox where the “advisor” is more capable than the ruler. This conflict has existed before capitalism and will likely exist after it, which will be the next struggle perhaps?

What I’m thinking about is not Utopia, it’s something scarier. A place where everyone has fully developed sense of self, capable of functioning autonomously, every single person is a leader and at the same time a worker. I suppose you could call it Outer Heavens

:hug

You shouldn’t I overshared. It’s my fault for dumping so much info on people unannounced. I’ll try to do a CW in the future and keep it to a minimum. Don’t feel sorry for me please.