Thanks for your work!

In canada they banned competition for no reason… It has to come from the imperial core and vassal states or it’s illegal

Yes! I also is interested in that because I can’t find anything about that anywhere!

You say that informal censorship is always dictated by class relations ?

That’s an interesting take.

I always saw echo chambers (what you call informal censorship) as inability to cope with a cognitive dissonance. It’s a way to emotionally protect one self from others beliefs.

In more than a way, a semi closed environment like lemmygrad is that, I think.

I don’t see it as censorship but more like a way to have constructive conversations about some subjects.

That’s an interesting take none the less!

Oh, what you are describing is called an echo chamber. It’s mostly an opt in mechanism?

I wouldn’t call that censorship at all! But I get your point.

The only thing you said I think is wrong is that de facto censorship always exist.

Censorship is created by a social entity hidding or faking data. Any advanced mind can take these incomplete or faked conclusions and from there find out that the data has been messed with.

Any “trust me bro” arguments can be rejected from the get go. Any information without it’s reproduction steps has no meaning, only an agenda.

People are pretty bright animals on the individual level, but where they fail is that they are social animals which will take cue from other social animals and social entitiesml.

What you see as de facto censorship is only a natural consequence of this mechanism.

But this can be countered with proper education of both the social animals and the social entities.

Fatalism is not needed here because we know that we can build social constructs that can change both how the social animal and the social entity comport themselves.

All in all , a censorship attempt, for a social animal that reject social cues from it’s peers, is at best an attack on it’s agency and intelligence, as worst a proof that the social entity has a hidden agenda and whishes a bad outcome to the censored.

And this attempt will by itself, because the social animal has an advanced mind, create an interest in what the other entity is trying to hide.

We can see this in action with antivaxxer, flat-earthers and so on, in which de facto censorship does not exist.

These examples are not the best, because they also get influenced by bad messaging -a sort of propaganda created by bad actors be it animal or entities - but they examplify the mechanism I am talking about.

Sorry, my English is quite poor this morning as I am very tired from bullshit events in my life.

So if im not very clear, I’m sorry again.

I don’t think censorship is the way. I feel it’s a fear driven approach and paternalistic.

It’s easy to see with your own eyes the decay of western society, because the supposed material gain is rooted in elitism and barely hidden exploitation.

The only way to convert the liberals is to show them what is really going on in the material world of western society. Keeping it censored will allow liberalism to fester and grow unchecked in china as these people will have their ideas reinforced by not being in contact with what liberalism really cause.

Excellent corrections I think!

The loss of the six grand fathers is such an insult also … casual erasure of a whole people …

Yup! From a very fast search, the sculptor was a confederate apologist or somesuch. He died in 1940 something, and was building for the KKK during the KKK schism of 1920 of which I don’t have any idea what it means.

I’m pretty sure early 1900 american racism was not exactly as modern racism considering there were actual bounties on first nation people… Like we pay you to kill them type of bounties.

My (first nation) grand father like to talk about thoses stories but he’s a liar and I have no idea if what he say is true at all

It’s well documented, I’m pretty sure whatever source I will give will be rejected as not good, so do the research, it takes a few minutes…

Edit : oh! You did!! Nice!!!

It’s not true tho.

The sculptor worked on KKK projects but Rushmore itself was not funded by KKK.

It’s still a monument to wrongdoing but we don’t need to lie to make it look bad.

No,

Serious teams know that building big software is hard and that starting by having a set deadline is the first failure point of a project.

Serious team wants a set budget and feature set. They also want a dialog with the aquiring party, because as you dig deeper in the software you uncover oddities. These oddities are more often than not a failure of the aquiring party understanding of their own business operations.

And thus, a serious team will help the aquiring party refine their business process by either removing useless steps, adding missings steps or changing a step in the overall workflow. And that’s were the most of the value of making a new software comes from.

Doing waterfall will stop this from happening and will remove actual value from the software because it’s going to be bloated with useless things that were badly understood by the aquiring party.

Agile is about producing as much value as possible, as fast as possible, in a set budget.

English is my third language so sorry if it’s hard to understand or feel aggressive.

I have no idea what I’m talking about but would that be enough to replace the magnetosphere? From what I understand, a Magnetosphere is needed to have a sustainable colony, unless this has been disproved recently …

I don’t feel like I have to discuss with someone who clearly is in bad faith.

Go learn about a subject before talking about it, that’s it. All you said was petulant bullshit. Go read La conquete du pain or something before talking about anarchy, you clearly have no idea what you are talking about and instead are reugitating speudo-intellectual word salad.

If you’re so fragile you feel you need to block me, i have no words for you other than : go touch grass, go read about your subjet and come back a better person.

I wish you well!

I never said anything like that. I never said i beleived in anarchy. You just are factually wrong on all counts.

Go read the anarchist philosophers, you’ll see what I mean.

You are still writing word salad by the way… Really … Touch grass, read a book about the subject you want to talk about and come back a changed person!

I wish you well!

Well, I don’t understand why you think anarchist means no rules.

It means no hierarchy.

It’s even the whole word itself.

An-Archy. Hier-archy.

So your thesis is based on wrong assumptions and is a word salad from my point of view.

Yeah, also, lenninsist/Stalinist also have a weird idea about that statement.

Permanent revolution from his writings means that he saw that the bourgeoisie were always creeping back in power and building a new powerbase in the new framework.

What I think he meant (because it’s not very clear from his letters) is that he wanted countries to never solidify power in an elite group and instead act like a new revolutionary countty all the time. That does not mean actual revolution forever. I might be wrong but that’s how I read it.

Was it feasible or realistic ? I don’t know, but I know that Mao said about the same thing after the cultural revolution.

It depends!

Is this going to put you or others in danger? If the climate is non-violent and really academic I don’t see a problem.

But if you fear for your security or that of others, I wouldn’t risk it.

University’s also usually have more freedom of expression granted.

I used to run a Roleplay Club in college that had after hour philosophy sessions. I don’t think I converted anyone but it made me kiss a lot of people that was out of my reach…

Ahhh to be 20 again…

Also you can market it as a “critic club” and have all sort of maxists text and have people debate them.

I like the sentiment but aa is … Urgh…

But yeah this looks like a call for help.

Hahaha yeah, kinda bad I guess!

We need a few specialists to teach well me guessing