I don’t see how Franklin Graham meeting with Alexander Lukoshenko to permit an evangelism rally in Belarus has got anything to do with that. Maybe you’re after the wrong guy? Franklin Graham mainly does charity work with Samaritan’s Purse, and was also a pretty significant COVID-19 vaccination distributor to those who aren’t well off. His Father, Billy Graham was well known for engaging with many world leaders as well for the sake of The Gospel.

How big? I looked over his Wikipedia article and it said he resigned from being a republican right back in 2015.

Even then, it seems trump much prefers heretical “prosperity gospel” preachers at his side who’d compare him to Jesus (Paula White-Cain) than the likes of Graham, who apparently told him off for swearing a few years ago.

Edit: yeah reading deeper he seemed to have had some levels of soft support for him, a lot of it seems to be more of just being in denial. We cannot expect people to be perfect anyway

His father even managed to give Kim Il Sung a Bible. The Graham family are legendary.

I don’t see how that’s relevant

It’s “Your Majesty”. Straight to the tower!

Royal speeches is part of how Parliament operates… The King sets forth what the Prime Minister has told him what the agenda is. Sure, it’s steeped in ceremony and history, but the British constitutional monarchy system has worked for centuries, and anyone who thinks that removing this process will add wealth taxes or is even necessary for wealth taxes is delusional.

The lady in the video itself doesn’t even say anything about the system. She just states that the agenda wasn’t up to scratch. If anything, the whole system was a benefit here due to the transparency of the Government’s shortcomings laid out by the speech.

If every wealthy person paid as much into the treasury from their possessions as the King did (typically 70%), we wouldn’t be complaining.

Lastly, the King isn’t even super-super rich. He had less money than Rishi Sunak did. The King is estimated to have around £500 million for personal spending at the end of the day, which is a lot, but he’s not a billionaire. If anything, it probably calls for reflection that our own King who we dress in gold, silk, diamonds and pageantry isn’t even scratching the surface of the “super wealthy” who are in the billions.

“zealous atheists” links to the article for New Atheism which is even funnier

Thank you for the work you do!!

I got Ubuntu. It gives me weird warning messages on boot. Sometimes they’re red. I just ignore them.

SARGE??? BLOOD SARGE???

How are they supposed to get into the country?

Through programmes, or if it’s a case where, let’s say they came over as a student or another legal immigrant, etc.

People in hotels can’t work, they can only start to work if their asylum application is accepted.

Their intention is that it will be usually.

There’s even a section in the video addressing this point, but just to reiterate, the conditions for people in these hotels are abysmal.

Should think about that before boarding a rubber dinghy.

Most have their claims accepted

It shouldn’t be if they’re coming from a safe country.

This is an incredibly callous thing to say and makes me question your sense of morality.

My logic is simple: if someone is coming to the UK from a safe country, then they aren’t a refugee.

Kinda feel like we should leave them just to see what happens

Why the needless cruelty?

To discourage the funding of people traffickers, putting them on small boats and sending them across from France.

Surely Britain should treat potential refugees better.

Depends what they’re fleeing from. Afghanistan? Nigeria? Iran? Sure.

France? Albania (unless someone is at risk due to apostasy or homosexuality/trans identity, etc) No.

A large portion of these people are just economic migrants - and ones who don’t respect our laws at that, considering they’re trying to weasel their way into our compassion as “refugees”. They see our compassion as something to be taken advantage of. They see how good it is that we give them hotels, excursions and spending money. That we have useful idiot “human rights lawyers” advocating to continue doing this. That’s why they come over in droves, to take advantage of us.

There are a portion of people who come over from unsafe countries and valid visas, or find themselves here when they would be endangered back at home, and claim asylum out of desperation. I don’t even oppose giving people like these hotels and free classes.

There are also of course people who want to migrate within the legal framework and the laws. I fully respect these people and they should be treated with dignity like anyone else on this land.

But anybody who comes across in a rubber dinghy or over the Irish border has already shown full and complete disregard for our country and can sit and think about it on a “prison vessel” until they decide to return home voluntarily, or actually somehow do get approved. I don’t even want to label these people as “immigrants” or “refugees”. It tarnishes and stigmatises the name of actual legitimate immigrants and refugees. Now “asylum seeker” and even “immigrant” can be stigmatised to just mean these people.

Hm?

It’s good craic

Why has the country that has always defended it’s “right to bear arms” in case the government comes after you, now bending over backwards and spreading their arse cheeks when these goons come to take their wife???

I am aware. And I hate it. Especially when people assume that I’m one of them. It causes me deep distress how people hide behind Christ as a justification for immoral actions.

Why can’t we just set up a tent camp on a Scottish island? We aren’t obligated to give them much. The Bibby Stockholm was also a good idea.

These people scare me

Trad men like femboys?