Independent politician Yekaterina Duntsova wanted to run on a platform to end the war with Ukraine.

But the electoral commission voted unanimously to reject her candidacy three days after her application, citing 100 “mistakes” on her form.

Ms Duntsova said she would appeal the decision at the Supreme Court.

The commission said 29 people have so far filed to run for the presidency. But after today’s decision, Mr Putin remains the only candidate to be able to register as a candidate.

  • girlfreddyOP
    link
    fedilink
    1926 months ago

    Mr Putin remains the only candidate to be able to register as a candidate.

    He doesn’t even try to pretend anymore.

    • Dept
      link
      136 months ago

      at least pull a Sisi and have some unknowns on the ballot.

  • @dotdi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    1036 months ago

    Seems like Putin will get all 132% of the votes this time, since he will be the only one on the ballots.

    • umbraroze
      link
      fedilink
      266 months ago

      Reporter: “Mr. Putin, how is it possible that you got 132% of the vote?”
      Putin: “It is merely the byproduct of our superiour domestic mathematical sciences. The numbers are simply greater than the ones produced by foreign-made axioms. Do think of all of the great achievements our mathematicians have done over centuries, such as proving the Poincaré conjecture.”
      Reporter: (gasp) “Your ballot results were tabulated by Grigori Perelman?”
      Putin: “No, we looked at his qualifications but we figured he was out of our reach, unfortunately. We had the results tabulated by some other weird mathematician with a massive case of cabin fever. We saved a lot of taxpayer money this way.”

      • @ApexHunter@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        86 months ago

        You see, only 39% of the population voted. 95% of the people who voted, voted for Putin. So if you extrapolate that out to the entire population, you get 37% + 95% = 132%. With math like that you can’t lose!

    • @cvozbosher@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      326 months ago

      You obviously have no idea what you’re talking about. Current polling has major regions in russia polling 113% of the popular vote to putin. Do your research.

      • you wouldnt believe how staunchly those kind of polls are quoted to prove the popular support of the regime in online(and offline) discussions here and beyond the border

        • lad
          link
          fedilink
          56 months ago

          What’s worse is that people believe in those numbers, although hopefully not all do

  • @kaibae@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    276 months ago

    Ah yes, “elections” in Russia for “president.” Coming soon to the US if Republicans get their way.

      • PugJesus
        link
        fedilink
        76 months ago

        Putin won over 100% of the vote in several regions. I’m sure filling out blank votes is child’s play by comparison.

  • Андрей Быдло
    link
    fedilink
    196 months ago

    Ha. ha. ha.

    No, I was totally after voiting for her, and was in a pool of her initial signings. But having that toothless candidate who’s just for the peaceful sky and everything being nice, and progressive, just declined,

    a candidate that could’ve been collected like 5% on votes in march,

    it shows, how fragile and scared these apparatchiks, or rather chekists are.

    They want none even questioning war. They fear Tikhanovskaya 2.0, everyone cooperating against the regime under one, any banner, their campaign as a general protest. Just as a possibility.

    I don’t feel like her campaign could do that much, or even a fraction of what fearless, furious belarusian bastards did in 2020 before russian corps got involved

    (and you need to fucking note it, and pay for the first round for them if you meet any),

    but even that little is scary to them. And it speaks volumes more than any queries into public opinion done in decaying police state with a raging propaganda.

    I don’t want to be too positive about that and say tis’ are bad news, but also a slight promise of good news, or something. At many points before like in 2011 I hoped that’s the time the straw would break a donkey’s back, and they just kept on going.

    But she’s no Navalny, no Nemtsov, just a nobody, and they shut her off. And it means something.

      • Андрей Быдло
        link
        fedilink
        66 months ago

        I wonder if he even knows about her. Guy’s like stuck in the ninghties, and everything he gets is in printed papers. There’s a doubt someone even said to him she exists.

        And defenestration is too far in her roadmap, still. She didn’t even said any ugly words like ‘war’, or even ‘lustration’. Duntsova has much to do to claim her out-of-the-window voyage. And, still, got denied.

    • athos77
      link
      fedilink
      136 months ago

      Anyone notice how the news of Navalny disappearing just … disappeared as well?

      • @Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        76 months ago

        Oh there’s still some stuff around. Seems like the Russian courts have cleared their schedules of all things Navalny. But, there isn’t a lot. Gone Baby Gone.

      • @GiuseppeAndTheYeti@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        16 months ago

        Not that I want that to drop out of the media circuit but there’s only so much to report on. How many different ways can you say a politician disappeared? Especially when the guy responsible is a dictator that simply won’t answer any questions regarding the person at hand.

  • cannache
    link
    fedilink
    66 months ago

    Meh I’m glad I’m not Russian but hey man, people be crazy over there