https://12axes.vercel.app/

I didn’t know what comm this belonged in so I put it in askchapo because I guess a quiz is asking you something?

You better do the extreme version you lazy fucks. 240 questions. I bet you won’t last 10 before you want to murder the quiz writer.

I’m so bad at answering these because some of the questions are “Guuuh do you kill all da trees or starve? These are the only options for some reason.”

I blame Jung for false dichotomies in personality quizzes

Also this: Ummm, that’s. Concerning libbing-out

  • agentant [any]@hexbear.netEnglish
    9·
    14 hours ago

    I took this one the other day because of the underzealots video on it, I only have a few screenshots saved from it and I know I got placed as a demsoc the first time I took it, and I got the more accurate plain socialist label the second time.

    This question is very funny though, an entire party bureaucracy is the same as one man according to this quiz

  • insurgentrat [she/her, it/its]@hexbear.netEnglish
    8·
    19 hours ago

    Apparently I’m a 100% progressive Tito fangirl.

    Idk Yugoslavia worked ok for a bit until it catastrophically didn’t. Not sure “fraught confederation of distinct ethinic groups held together by one really effective guy” accurately represents my political positions lmao.

    Also deeply sceptical that it’s mapped engles and graeber as basically also agreeing with this, given the whole fundamentally different ideologies they have lmao.

    Not sure why I need opinions on stuff like managing interests rates. Seems to depend heavily on the structure of the government no?

  • RedWizard [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netEnglish
    8·
    16 hours ago

    time I did this I was economically Pol Pot… But I was also only picking strong agree or strong disagree with almost every answer LMAO.

    Edit: OK I took the full test

    I have no idea who this dude is. I’m convinced of you get 100% progressive you get him and hasan piker in your top 2…

    But also, WHAT THE FUCK are they talking about here…

    I’ll take this one though

    Also again why are individual states included here??

    James Conoly baby!

    What’s a wizard gotta do to be a Bolshevik in this house, HUH?!

    OK there is a search box at the bottom that let’s you compare your results to other things and its clear the definition of “democracy” is at fault here. All AES states skew to the Autocratic side of the scale. I don’t know how they figure out how “progressive” someone like Lenin was… The “progressive” category is more like socially progressive then “progressive” in the historical sense.

    • OBJECTION!@lemmy.mlEnglish
      10·
      19 hours ago

      “Economically Pol Pot” is hilarious. Like, imagine something like, “I’m economically Pol Pot but socially John Maynard Keynes.”

  • tocopherol [any]@hexbear.netEnglish
    12·
    21 hours ago

    Dear god sadness

    Although I selected neutral on what felt like 50% of the questions so idk. But you are right I do hate the writer of this, maybe just because they showed the truth I didn’t want to admit kitty-cri LIB

  • OBJECTION!@lemmy.mlEnglish
    9·
    21 hours ago

    I made it through the entire 240 questions but it didn’t take long to figure out which ones are always going to be neutral (who I support between regional and national administration depends entirely on who’s in control of them) and which ones will always be “strongly agree/disagree” (yes, immigrants and queer people do have rights, no, I don’t want to go to war for the sake of whatever “the national interest” is supposed to mean).

    I’m more progressive that 100% of ideologies and apparently the closest country to me ideologically is checks notes Wales??

    • Dort_Owl [they/them, any]@hexbear.netOPEnglish
      5·
      19 hours ago

      Same, especially with stuff like “we should reduce consumption rather than imvest in technology to save the environment, even if it means a lower quality of life”

      Like whose consumption? If we ended the wastefulness of capitalist production methods and made resource distribution more efficient, there would be very little quality of life changes for most people. The stuff you would have to go without would be things like “No you cannot buy 1000 ibuprofen in one go, why would anyone need that?”

      • insurgentrat [she/her, it/its]@hexbear.netEnglish
        6·
        19 hours ago

        The human enhancement stuff was all baffling. Is the technology safe and equitable? Are there risks of changing behaviour in undesirable ways? What will happen to people who don’t want to be modified?

        The end is actually important, a school nutrition program is an intelligence enhancement technology done right. Evilcorp brain chips for the rich are only permissible if the operation is always fatal.