ok bear with me, since I have dyscalculia and don’t get these things easily:
does the whole diagram say: “over time the model numbers change” and that’s it?Yes, it’s the height is based on the vendor’s model number they chose themselves at that time
So if I released some shitty Super Smarto 2000.2 tomorrow, I’d be in the lead
thank you for explaining, wasn’t sure if I was being stupid or this diagram!
(but I’m gonna name my model “your name plus always one count higher than yours” so I’ll win, ÄTSCH)
You can only tie with my AI, Ultra autocomplete: Version Infinity.
Nuh uh my AI is in version ℵ1
My AI is version supercompact!
Joke’s on them, I’m almost done training FaceBot 9000.
Granted, it’s a 1.2B model and the training data is entirely My Little Pony fanfics. It’s insane and thinks it’s Princess Luna. But it’s going to dominate this benchmark.
Oh sweet I always wanted to talk to Princess Luna!
Your avatar image checks out. :)
Its actually based on the Nightelves but yeah also applicable to best Princess :)
You’re fine until 300ok shows up.
Don’t look in the mirror and say their name 3 times
Number goes up, can’t argue with that!
Graph is wrong, GPT is clearly using negative numbers
We don’t want to lose the number war, but we didn’t start itTM
Gotta look past the bad charting - GPT’s line is just going lower and lower with each release.
Even taking the chart at face value Anthropic looks on pace to catch up
