• 4am@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        7 天前

        Too much carbon dioxide vs oxygen in the air. Your body cannot power itself and unless you find a supplemental source of oxygen, you asphyxiate in the destroyed atmosphere.

        Like trying to breathe on Mars.

      • Pomal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        6 天前

        The PH levels in your blood are going to decrease, reducing storage for necessary elements of metabolic reactions (calcium, phosphorus) in the medium. This is going to impact children and the elderly first, where cellular death is going to slowly cascade across their bodies.

        • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          6 天前

          There is no evidence blood pH levels are affected. This is alarmist media. Are we going to ban soda?

          • unbanshee@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 天前

            There absolutely is, and you can do a simple experiment at home with some water, indicator solution (one can be made with red cabbage juice, but we used to use methylene blue when we did it at the science centre) and a soda water maker (or dry ice) to see it happen.

            It’s not completely representative, obviously, but blood is mostly water and the same pH change we can see in carbonation water will happen to blood plasma.

            • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              6 天前

              Biochemist here. People on Lemmy should read links they post.

              As with any buffer system, the pH is balanced by the presence of both a weak acid (for example, H2CO3) and its conjugate base (for example, HCO−3) so that any excess acid or base introduced to the system is neutralized.

              A lot of academic labs love to get attention with alarmist claims, and assume the actual data was done properly.

              See DTT, see BPA, bullshit that never dies.

              • fake_meows@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                6 天前

                The literal paper that this post is about says multiple things about this subject. Did you read that paper?

                Thing #1 is that blood ph is decreasing in lockstep with atmospheric CO2.

                Thing #2 is that it appears the body’s buffering system is stressed and is pulling additional calcium + phosphorus from the skeleton to aid in buffering.

                So your comment isn’t wrong about the basic idea, you just didnt observe what’s happening the larger context. PH is not only predicted to drop, we have already seen it drop, it’s already started to happen.

                For this alarmist claim to be wrong, are you suggesting they cannot even accurately measure blood ph?

    • SorryImLate@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 天前

      Do you perhaps mean ~2070 (50 years after the end of the study data date range)? I mean, both are really scary, the one just gives us a tad more time.

      • Pomal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 天前

        No, I mean 2050 is when we start to see linkable deaths. We don’t have time, that’s the point.

        • LucySchmoocy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 天前

          But that’s not what the article you linked said, so where are you getting 2050 from? The study says if CO2 continues to increase at the same current rate, we would be at the top end of the healthy max bicarbonate level by 2076. Do you have extra info that connects what is said in the article to 2050?

          • fake_meows@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            6 天前

            This 2024 study cuts off the trendline data in 2019. They give the annual rate of increase in CO2 concentration at “over 2ppm” which was the observed rate at that time.

            However the rate surged, and in 2024 it was + 3.75ppm, almost doubling the speed of increase from those predictions. This is what the OP comment means by “at current rates”, the paper is way off from how fast things are moving now. We will get higher CO2 much sooner than what they predicted.

            The paper basically just says there is an almost linear relationship between atmosphere and blood chemistry, so if we get higher CO2 faster, the health effects will track that.

            So instead of 50 years until health effects, think ~ 30 years from now.

          • Pomal@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 天前

            That’s the top end, you have to look at the bottom-end to understand the impacts to those marginalized populations - youths and seniors.

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 天前

    geez. 7% since 99 so more than a quarter percent per year but I bet its going up faster more recently than at the turn of the millenia.

  • SorryImLate@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 天前

    My dad had COPD, which also increases the CO2 levels in the blood. His body was able to adapt to the gradual increase as his illness progressed, the problems arose when he had even the mildest illness, causing a rapid spike. His body couldn’t adapt fast enough and suddenly he’d be on oxygen but still asphyxiating. It was awful.

  • Nouvellalia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 天前

    Yes, you are a walking swamp in a balloon. What CO2 is doing to the ocean will also happen to your insides. There is only an extremely porous membrane between the two.

    We can also expect changes to our microbiome, water saturation levels, running temperature, etc, just like everything else.