France’s top court has blocked a ban on social media access for under-15s, ruling that it infringed freedom of expression and privacy.

A law approved by parliament in July would have barred under-15s from opening social media accounts from the beginning of September. Tech platforms would also have been required to close existing accounts within four months and use age-verification tools approved by ⁠France’s privacy regulator.

However, the constitutional council found that while the law required users to provide proof ​of age, it failed to specify the “conditions and limits” ‌under which this should happen. It also found that the restrictions infringed freedom of expression and privacy.

“The council holds that the contested provisions, on ‌the one hand, disproportionately infringe upon the freedom of expression and communication and, on the other, fail to provide the legal safeguards necessary to ensure the right to respect for private life,” it said.

:)

  • yyprum@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 days ago

    Oh really? You don’t say…!

    Obvious as it is, it is nice to see some places still have some minimum of sanity.

    • rnercle@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Obvious as it is, it is nice to see some places still have some minimum of sanity.

      do you call the Conseil constitutionnel the minimum?

      🤣

    • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 days ago

      Yeah, they should (morally).

      But countries have different constitutions that grant different rights, eg. in Australia there seems to be no constitutional right to freedom of speech or expression at all. So it is difficult to argue that there…

      We can’t trust courts to get things like this right any more than we can trust legislatures.