• finley@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    1 天前

    This isn’t a clever loophole – – this is Trump making sure that only billionaires can profit, and the rest of us are all fucked

    • Fmstrat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 小时前

      It doesn’t actually seem that way. They’re likely eating the tariff because of the costs of hardware redesign, which I would imagine to cost millions and a lot of testing time.

      If they’re getting a volume discount of 10%, then after tarrif each vehicle is probably cheaper than a whole refab.

  • TransNeko@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 天前

    yeah… sure… so very worried about “national security” that security risks can only be used by government employees, big corporations, and in federal buildings but not in private homes… yeah sure… that’s secure. Really feeling the security of the nation here… NOT.

    • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 天前

      All of the cost, none of the equity. Just as capitalism demands.

      Distributed burden, with the profits for the few.

      What did we do with the railroad barons again? And where’s their privatised cutting-edge tech??

  • Tiral@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    40
    ·
    11 小时前

    I don’t think a single person has actually been to China or understands what it’s actually like beyond tiktoc propaganda.

    You all are crying for shit cheap EVs, then if you get them you’re going to cry that your house burns down and it’s Trunps fault. I would be as happy as the next person if the orange flavored dip shit was gone, but you’ve created a no win situation

    I find it also amazing that people are willing to forego actually paying people enough to have a living so long as they save money. China is a COMMUNIST country, and reguardless how you feel about it, they apress the fuck out of their people.

    • godsammitdam@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      8 小时前

      I’m an American. I’ve been multiple times, mostly for work.

      You’re a fucking propagandist stfu. Cause yeah, capitalism is oppressing no one right now. Or blowing their limbs off.

      You stupid fucks can’t realize that those in power regardless of societal or governmental structure are the problem. Authoritarianism is the problem. Does the CCP have problems? Of course. But is American capitalism perfect? Sure as fuck no. Build a better system. Learn from all of them. And the answer will NEVER be capitalism as it requires exploitation and oppression to profit by default.

      No one is more pro-regulation than a capitalist when competition is growing in their market.

      So I repeat, respectfully, shut the fuck up.

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 小时前

      China was a communist country, long ago. Now, they are communist in name only. And yet America still “apresses” [sic] their people (and the rest of the world) under a capitalist system so what gives?

    • djsiete@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      11 小时前

      HAHAHAHAHAH

      Edit: am in China rn, it’s even better than the TikTok propaganda. Would live here in a heartbeat instead of the racist and islamophobic West that bombed my country and called me a Muslim scum when I fled to their so called humanitarian safe havens.

  • solrize@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 天前

    At least til recently, Waymo here in California was using modified Jaguars. IDK if they started out as Jaguar EV’s or if they were ICE cars converted by Waymo. But they are everywhere in SF and also seen in other parts of the region.

    • ramble81@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 天前

      They are Jaguar I-Pace EVs. They were natively EV to begin with. Waymo actually purchased large chunks of them through 2026, but with Jaguar basically committing suicide they needed another vehicle to work with.

  • Coke@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 天前

    Does this have to do with safety regulations or something? Like what is the reasoning behind it? Because I heard these Chinese cars dont have good safety regulations

    • TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 小时前

      It has to do with the cars talking to each other and perhaps eavesdropping on other vehicles, etc.

      https://www.bis.gov/press-release/commerce-finalizes-rule-secure-connected-vehicle-supply-chains-foreign-adversary-threats

      Washington, D.C. – Today, the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) announced a final rule prohibiting certain transactions involving the sale or import of connected vehicles integrating specific pieces of hardware and software, or those components sold separately, with a sufficient nexus to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) or Russia.

      BIS and its Office of Information and Communications Technology and Services (OICTS) have found that certain technologies originating from the PRC or Russia present an undue and unacceptable risk to U.S. national security. Today’s action represents the culmination of a months-long regulatory process to design, seek public input on, and ultimately finalize a measure to protect drivers and passengers on American roads.

    • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      1 天前

      The reasoning is to protect us companies from having to invest in better factories and design, any manufacturer’s cars meet whatever safety standards they are designed to meet.

      • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        1 天前

        US companies are just a small fraction of auto sales in the US and two of the three make most of their money selling trucks and big SUVs which aren’t even in the same vicinity as Chinese EVs competition wise. Stop spreading disinformation.

          • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 天前

            Why because that’s how you guys feel and because you state the claim with confidence (but nothing else)?

            The auto industry in the US is already dominated by foreign brands and has been for quite a long time. It doesn’t make any sense as being the reason because that ship sailed long ago, and as I already described, two of the three remaining US automakers don’t even bother competing in the segment that Chinese EVs operate in, so what US company does it protect apart from Tesla which makes up a whopping 3% of the entire market?

            • Free Trampoline!?@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 天前

              It doesn’t matter if the competitor is a gas car or not, an EV on the market is a car on the market, at a set price on the market.

              There are no way, no EV for me, nuh uh people just as well as there are EV or nothing people, just as well as there are I just gotta get to work, man people.

              what US company does it protect apart from Tesla which makes up a whopping 3% of the entire market?

              All of them. No EV? Factor gas into the monthly payment. EV? Consider the gas as part of the monthly payment.

              Quit building fake goal posts, a car is a car, and any customer will buy one if it suits their budget. If a Chinese car suited their budget, they’d buy it.

              • Coke@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 小时前

                you haven’t really address that the US is already dominated by foreign brands though so it doesn’t make sense to exclude china specifically unless there are other reasons beyond just keeping the US companies dominant. TryingToBeGood cited security concerns which i think is probably the more likely reason.

                • Free Trampoline!?@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 小时前

                  you haven’t really address that the US is already dominated by foreign brands though

                  That wasn’t really part of my grievance. Our domestic brands are even foreign brands. Ford and Chevy motors are made in Mexico and the electronics are all Chinese or Mitsubishi accross every US brand. The optics shit about domestic vs foreign is more political than real. I see more MAGA fucktards in Nissan Leafs due to poverty than I do Dodge Chargers.

                • SailorMoss@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 小时前

                  If protectionism is not a consideration why were there massive controversial bailouts when US auto started to fail?

                  The answer is simple.

                  Its not either/or its both. The brands in the US are from countries allied with the US. They don’t want China to have more manufacturing that can potentially be used in war. Conversely they want US manufacturing that can be used in war.

                  The industry they’re protecting just happens to be used for civilian purposes right now.

                  They’re telling you Chinese cars spies on you because they want you to think your interests and the states interest align with regards to war with China.

        • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          23 小时前

          China makes EV SUVs, they’re just as awful as their American counterparts despite being slightly better for the environment.

          But the part that the big auto manufactures fear is that they would destroy the market; they understood awhile ago that every wagon they sell is a lost SUV sale, which has a way higher margin, every sedan a lost sport-crossover sale, every minivan a lost 4dr pickup.

          Dealers hate EVs because they lose so much on servicing, and dealership owners are one of the most chuddy groups.

    • Ariselas@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 天前

      They are supposed to be as good or better than cars made by the US Big 3. Then once the new sodium ion batteries come out, they will be far safer.

    • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 天前

      only to some extent, it’s not like the safe models aren’t being blocked. I think for example, the BYD Dolphin was redesigned to meet australian compliance.

      Chinese companies are willing to redesign for saftey, but the government of course has other plans.

      Basically some chinese cars by their direct chinese design, might not pass US safety standards. However china has shown they are willing to modify designs to enter the market. the only reason why they aren’t in the US market is because the government wont let them. Corporate has been using chinese evs (and trucks) and buses, for awhile now.