• ruuster13@lemmy.zipEnglish
    241·
    8 天前

    “as it exists today.”

    Economic policy is just the engine that moves the economy. The real problem runs deeper. Greedy men love that the socialism vs capitalism debate gets so much attention.

    • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zipEnglish
      9·
      8 天前

      You have to consider that they have to ask this question in the most neutral way to get the most accurate responses. If they tried schooling the people who think reality is fucked, but are not full on socialist (yet), that shit never works. And would skew the responses.

    • taiyang@lemmy.worldEnglish
      7·
      8 天前

      This data is a few years old so we can already answer that: they crashed their economy by not raising inflation rates after COVID, then elected a woman who wants to be the next Margaret Thatcher. The love of capitalism is fucking them quite hard right now, lol

  • Solumbran@lemmy.worldEnglish
    72·
    8 天前

    Sure, France keeps on reelecting an ultracapitalist nazi-allied banker but they are against capitalism.

    I mean, at the same time Macron got elected by like 10% of the population so I guess it still works.

  • tyler@programming.devEnglish
    5·
    8 天前

    All countries with hardly any regulation of industry at all. Turns out economic systems don’t matter if there isn’t something to stop bad actors.

  • cRazi_man@europe.pubEnglish
    3·
    8 天前

    Thats higher numbers than I thought there would be in all the countries mentioned. I guess the question asks if people are happy with capitalism in its current state. That must include a whole bunch of people who think their country needs even more capitalism.

  • darthinvidious@lemmy.worldEnglish
    2·
    8 天前

    losing faith in capitalism realizing and coming to terms that capitalism is broken and was the real scam all along

  • Fizz@lemmy.nzEnglish
    32·
    8 天前

    All these countries have problems with long streaks of bad governance. They would suffer the same if not worse fates under an economic system where only the government drove economic growth.

  • PiraHxCx@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
    98·
    8 天前

    34k people in 28 countries? About 1.2k per country? Even if it actually means 34k per country, the sample is so ridiculously small that this statistic accounts for nothing. I can assure you if I interview 1.2k people on the main street of my city in Brazil I will get a very very different number, with the vast majority not even understanding the question.

    • Successful_Try543@feddit.orgEnglish
      16·
      8 天前

      It all boils down on how representative for the entire population the participants of the statistics are chosen: location, age, gender, education, job, …

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.worldEnglish
      82·
      8 天前

      If your sample is a sufficiently random representative of the population, there won’t be a difference between 1,200 people and 12,000,000 people.

      • PiraHxCx@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
        27·
        8 天前

        Nope, theoretically true but not the least bit feasible in reality. My sample could at best represent my 160k people city, where 80% voted for our local Mussolini, not my 200m people country, which has wide regional differences (and didn’t elect the local Mussolini, even though my city and some entire states would have)… imagine India, with almost 1.5b people, and those interviews can’t possibly have the necessary geographical and social scope in countries that size with such an insignificantly small sample… what’s their methodology? Random pop-ups on social media? You already excluded a huge chunk of the population that doesn’t use social media at all, and depending on the social media, you just made an age cut as well, your sample is no longer random but only representing a certain demographic. Was it people standing in a big city interviewing passersby? Time and location will taint the results and, again, the geographical scope is insignificant. Random phone calls? Well-informed people have their numbers on “do-not-disturb” lists (a public service), don’t answer random questions from strangers on the phone, etc, etc, so your sample is not random enough anymore because a chunk of the population won’t be represented in it, etc, etc.

      • PiraHxCx@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
        25·
        8 天前

        Yeah, if if you expect 1000 people you interviewed at a corner next to a social sciences college or corner next to an evangelical church to represent a country with 200m population and huge cultural regional differences, sure.