However, our research shows that there is actually a big chunk of Americans – at times a proportion as large as 52% of voters – who neither support nor oppose antidemocratic practices. While only a small number of Americans outright support violating core democratic norms, many Americans express no opinion about politicians who undermine democracy.
We call this attitude toward antidemocratic practices “democratic neutrality,” and we believe it’s an overlooked and understudied threat to democracy.
Sounds like the Boomer Generation to me!
i call it soft fascism
Was there any actual democracy during the first 250?
I look at it differently. It’s not that they’re ambivalent to democracy, it’s that there are other things that they believe are more important to them, and democracy is only one path of many to get there, a means to an end.
Republicans have whipped up a frenzy of support based on issues like abortion restrictions, gun rights, and fear of immigrants and transgender people. (And “Communism”, now that the DSA is winning elections). Pump up these “threats” enough in people’s minds, and they become open to practices they would have resisted previously, in order to “take action” to “save America”. They’re willing to “break a few eggs” to get to the results they want.
After all, not every Republican stormed the Capitol. But in the votes we have had since then, we have found out that enough Republicans didn’t find what Trump did to incite those folks disqualifying to give him a second shot at it all. If you ask them why they voted for Trump again, no one would say “Because he will abandon democratic principles to get the outcome I want”. They would start with the outcomes (which usually involves getting rid of some group they don’t like, like immigrants or communists), and leave the rest unsaid.
