- cross-posted to:
- science@mander.xyz
- cross-posted to:
- science@mander.xyz
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/55880309
[…]
Publication metrics have long shaped career advancement in Chinese academia. Faculty evaluations, promotions, and funding allocations often hinge on the number of papers published in indexed journals. This system, while boosting output, created fertile ground for paper mills that sell authorship slots or complete manuscripts. Recent examinations of retraction data highlight how these incentives distort priorities, with many retractions tied to manipulated images, fabricated data, or compromised peer review processes originating from Chinese authors.
Analyses of thousands of retractions reveal patterns concentrated in certain disciplines and institutions. Biomedical and engineering fields appear frequently affected, reflecting the pressure on medical universities and technical colleges to meet quantitative targets.
[…]
One 2026 analysis across ten major publishers found Chinese institutions on over half of retracted articles, far exceeding the country’s share of global research output. Specific cases involve organized operations producing batches of similar papers, sometimes detected through image duplication or textual anomalies.
[…]
You must log in or # to comment.