• matlag@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Why would they be upset by the idea of a trillionaire making campaign donations?

    All they need to do is pledge allegiance!

  • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I’m taking a class on systems rn and we’re learning a lot of very basic level concepts that also have some overlap with business and economics. I don’t hold a degree in economics like mr. musk, but learning the little I have about systems has really made me question just wtf wealth hoarders (most of whom seem to be much more familiar with systems thinking) envision for the future?

    The idea of systems balancing or collapsing seems to be fundamental to ALL systems. So even if the goal is to collapse this one, and that’s why they don’t really care/maybe are trying to ensure it’s as unbalanced as possible, what happens in the next system that emerges as a result of their success?

    I really can’t buy they suddenly no longer feel the compulsive need to hoard resources because they’re motivated to preserve their own system.

    Has a chat bot convinced them there’s a special loophole and the rules that apply to every other system don’t apply to theirs?

  • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    His companies operate at a loss. How is this guy a trillionare? Not in my view.

  • krisevol@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    He didn’t have that wealth. He has stocks worth that much at current evaluations. The liquidity market wouldn’t allow him to get 10% of that is he tried

    • save_the_humans@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      How about those stocks get divvied up amongst the workers and converted to multi stakeholder cooperatives where they all then have a vote to remove the Elon? While we’re at it why not do that to every “publicly” owned company?

    • parricc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 hours ago

      It won’t be a huge number, though. Capitalism still works to consolidate wealth. While there never has been any private individual with that much wealth before in human history, that kind of wealth is not unprecedented. The main reason is that people with that kind of wealth have historically been emperors. And make no mistake, anyone with that kind of wealth carries with them the threat of becoming an emperor. After someone becomes an emperor or a dictator, they gain absolute control over the GDP of whatever they control. But even now, Musk’s wealth is not even 1% of the world’s GDP. Someone like Augustus Caesar would have had several times more wealth, and direct control over something like 25% of the world’s GDP. Musk having this much wealth is disgusting - nobody should even be a billionaire. But, at the same time, in the grand scheme of things, he will be nothing more than a footnote in history. He has never done anything actually memorable. People only know him now because he’s a cunt with a lot of power. But power fades, and the world has had countless cunts. In the end, he’s not anyone special. In 100 years, the average person will likely have no clue who he was. Nor will they care.

    • Furbag@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Not if we can summon the political will to tax them out of existence altogether.

      But who am I kidding? The oligarchs in control are just waiting for their turn to be trillionaires themselves.

  • nonentity@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

    Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but trillionaires should be forced to transition into billionaires, and billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.

  • Hackworth@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    102
    ·
    2 days ago

    A million seconds is ~11 days. A billion seconds is ~32 years. A trillion seconds is 31,689 years.

  • turdburglar@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 days ago

    citizen. yeah, no. i’m not calling that fuckknob a citizen. citizens contribute and participate in society.

    fuck elon musk. fuck xai.

    build the water treatment plant you promised the people of memphis.

  • oyzmo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    People growing up now is groomed by the system to not think, only consume! AI was the latest “do not think yourself, do not use your brain” implementation. Make the masses brain dead sheep that is easy to control.

  • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s okay, it’s all unrealized gains so he can’t do anything with it except to use it as a collateral, oh and especially NOT pay taxes.

    • Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Exactly this. It’s Schrödinger’s money.

      Worth nothing so it can’t be taxed and worth billions so it can be used as collateral to take out tax-free loans from the bank.

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Upside is if the stock crashes the banks get to harvest his organs or something. Don’t think anybody has been stupid enough to use stock collateral loans as one of their primary money source before, unless someone who threw themselves out a window during the stock market crash leading up to the great depression did so.

      • crapwittyname@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        True, but I think it’s the other way round. He’s a fascist because he’s obscenely wealthy. When you have that much power, empathy dies. It’s a downward spiral of negative feedback actually, the more power, the less empathy, the greater the lust for power and the more unscrupulous you can be, and so on.

  • brave_lemmywinks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Its fugazi, this money isn’t real, the worth is made up and expeculated.

    The eventual implosion of the American is going to be crazy, I’ve never heard any American politician even say the word austerity, they’ll be eating each other.

    • Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      Ah yes, uNrEaLiSeD gAiNs.

      Simultaneously worth nothing so it can’t be taxed and worth billions so it can be used as collateral to take out tax-free loans from the bank.

      Ever the paradox that one.

    • Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      It’s still fascism, so what you are describing is just Soylent Green but the citizens have the full freedom™ to chose any colour Soylent Green they want. #free

      (Also they have austerity, it’s just too big of a word to use publicly, but systemic cutting of programmes that don’t transfer public wealth to a few private pockets has been going on for 50 years now. The talk is the same as “austerity” in eg British politics - gutting the funds for the lazy bastards in healthcare, education, transport, etc … but not warcrime industry or the factory of tax cuts for the rich.)

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Well, no money is real.

      And unfortunately, it looks like the country is going to go on believing his valuation, right into a cyberpunk corporate dystopia.