• Pommes_für_dein_Balg@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    4 days ago

    Yes, if you change the words and the context, the meaning changes.
    “From the river to the sea” is the rallying cry of various groups who want to destroy Israel and remove the people who were born and live there, even though the slogan doesn’t literally say it.
    So maybe use a different slogan if you want something different?

    • qevlarr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s not surprising that antisemites would also protest Israel, but that doesn’t mean we should stop protesting Israel. There’s nothing more to it. We should not fall for our opponent’s tricks trying to paint us as antisemites

      • Pommes_für_dein_Balg@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        I’m not saying stop protesting Israel. I’m saying don’t use the slogan that’s used by Antisemites, if you don’t want to be confused with them.
        What’s wrong with shouting “Free Palestine, End The Occupation” instead?

        • qevlarr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Because our opponents will always be nibbling at what we can and cannot say and we should resist and reject their bad-faith criticism. Our opponents are trying to paint us as antisemites. Your honest attempt at distancing ourselves from antisemitic groups has exactly the opposite effect: It legitimizes their criticism where it was never in good faith to begin with

          • Pommes_für_dein_Balg@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            I’m honestly just confused why people who aren’t antisemites would insist on using the first part, alone.
            And omit the second part “Palestine must be free”, thereby creating the ambiguity of what they mean in the first place.

            • qevlarr@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              Why concede that ground, though? It’s not about the second part. They will always find something. Stop playing their game, you can’t ever win. It’s in bad faith

              There must be an Innuendo Studios video about this one, right?

          • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            Do you believe the same for the “anti-immigration” protests too, or were you calling everyone attending them racist and/or Nazis?

      • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Isn’t the left saying that if you let one Nazi into a bar you now have a Nazi bar? Same applies here. There are many anti-Semites in these protests chanting this saying, therefore everyone there is an anti-Semite.

        This isn’t me making the rules, it’s just applying the rules the left set and try to force on everyone.