• astraeus@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    16 hours ago

    inb4 everyone was betting yes so there was no profit and that’s why they pulled it

      • astraeus@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        mb. that’s odd then you’d think the kind of business already hosting betting predictions on wars wouldn’t gaf about nuke predictions. maybe they’ll fire the exec that made the choice

        • Arthur Besse@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          16 hours ago

          I think it’s actually maybe a bridge too far even for them - it reminds me of this scene in Bowling for Columbine where the brother of Oklahoma City bombing accomplice Terry Nichols reluctantly concedes that there should be some limits to the right to bear arms.

          • astraeus@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            16 hours ago

            Isn’t the government already blatantly proven to be profiting from these? I remember something about a white house address ending abruptly because some israeli account bet thousands on it ending early or wtv. surprised actual nuclear war is a breaking point. i guess it’s true you can’t really grift if your country gets counternuked and you die horribly