• OwOarchist@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Okay, but…

    Recently, my girlfriend (who I successfully migrated to Kubuntu) was complaining about ads on youtube, so I wanted to install Brave for her, since that works well as a chromium-based browser but still doesn’t show ads. (I’ve had issues trying to play youtube on Firefox with adblocker, probably because Google’s trying to discourage anything other than Chrome.)

    Brave was available in the app store, and installed as a Snap. And it was fine. It installed fine, it works fine, no issues. Maybe it’s not the most efficient way to do things, and there certainly are issues with the snap system. But … it’s not the devil, and it’s not the end of the world.

    • ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      6 hours ago

      As far as I know, technically speaking, Snap, the application side, is fully foss, but not the server side, meaning you can only install Snap packs integrated into the system from Canonical directly. And this is a big pain point for most.

      • N.E.P.T.R@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Snap has a far better permission system and avoids many of the security pitfalls of Flatpak, but it being hardcoded to use Canonical’s proprietary server is BS. Also forcing people to use Snap is BS.

  • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    15 hours ago

    The day I went to install something with APT and it forced installed the Snap with no easy way to tell it not to was the last day I ever ran Ubuntu on my PC

    • u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      I recently tried Ubuntu.
      Wait, no, I fought Ubuntu.

      Firefox was snap. OK, remove it and apt install. Nope, that installs a snap. Now, one more thing, for some reason uninstalling the snap version of Firefox took several minutes each time where it was “disconnecting” it from a bunch of things, or something along those lines.

      So I followed the Mozilla guide for Firefox installation on Ubuntu. Did it work? No. The higher priority setting for Mozilla repo from their guide didn’t work.
      Finally, I found the answer on OMG Ubuntu, and I could finally install the regular Firefox package.

    • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Same here.

      I had heard the issues, but thought - no big deal, right?

      Then I went to run something and it ran weird, so I checked which on the command line - and discovered my apt command had been intercepted and rerouted to snap.

      I forget the media (maybe multiple) where someone shoots their robot the first time it ignored a command, but it felt like that.

      I reimaged that machine to Debian or Mint shortly after that.

    • moonshadow@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      13 hours ago

      The day they mentioned snaps was the day I grumbled and started recommending mint instead. Or maybe that was the day they crammed sponsored search results into their start menu…

  • lmr0x61@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I gotta get my ass off Ubuntu. It’s literally just Business Debian—or in other words, Debian but worse.

  • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    12 hours ago

    One of the reasons Linux Mint is so great, all the awesome things about Ubuntu under the hood without any of the trash 😊