Can my SPARC server host a website?
rup12.net
The little corner of the internet owned by Darko!

TL;DR: … hosting a website on a 25-year-old Sun Netra X1 SPARC server running OpenBSD 7.8. The setup includes: Noctua fan mods for quiet operation, httpd serving static HTML/CSS, OpenBSD’s pf firewall with default-deny rules, and Cloudflare tunnels to expose it safely without port forwarding. The server pulls ~55MB of RAM and serves pages from my garage. Check it out live at sparc.rup12.net - because why not?

Well, the guy licks Cloudflare’s boots. Fuck that. He doesn’t understand the problem with that. So perhaps the real answer is NO, if he depends on Cloudflare Inc.

  • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.deEnglish
    10·
    1 day ago

    It would work fine without Cloudflare. The server is running the current version of OpenBSD, so it could be configured to safely host a website without any tunnels.

  • LiveLM@lemmy.zipEnglish
    71·
    23 hours ago

    Calm down dude, don’t crucify the guy just because he doesn’t want to directly expose his server to the outside.

  • vext01
    3·
    1 day ago

    I have one of those in my loft. Used to use it for OpenBSD development.

    • evenwichtOP
      42·
      1 day ago

      I have one as well, mothballed, which is why the article caught my attention. Then I saw all the mention of Cloudflare and thought: oh fuck, so it needs a wheelchair with a mouth joystick, in effect.

      What originally attracted me was running a full-blown ZFS, which was too license encumbered to be fully featured in linux or bsd, IIRC. I never got around to doing much with it. And now I wonder if ZFS is finally fully liberated on a FOSS platform.

      • vext01
        4·
        22 hours ago

        Yeah, sun did some really cool stuff towards the end. ZFS, zones, SMF. I always liked their ALOM lights out management too. RIP sun.

        My file server uses zfs on Linux.

        As the other commenter says, GPL somewhat disagrees with the license. It flips the taint flag on the Linux kernel too.

        I tried btrfs, but it’s not ready IMHO.

      • hexagonwin@lemmy.today
        4·
        1 day ago

        it’s just GPL that’s incompatible with ZFS’s CDDL. FreeBSD has ZFS support built in (OpenZFS). Linux is also supported by OpenZFS.

        • evenwichtOP
          2·
          12 hours ago

          Originally ZFS could not be a boot disk because of the license issue. There was some other important feature that was denied to linux users, originally (forgot what it was). Apparently the booting restriction was eventually overcome. I don’t really grasp how the licensing changed that made booting possible.

          Conceptually ZFS was relatively superior to all other filesystems. If it’s fully liberated, I don’t get why it is not more popular. I might expect it to be a default of sorts when installing Debian.