• Jaysyn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 minutes ago

    Why are you still using Tik-Tok.

    You know it’s compromised, yet still try to make it work.

  • mriormro@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 hours ago

    If you haven’t deleted your tiktok account by now, then I don’t know what to tell you.

  • mechoman444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    I downloaded tiktok when it first came out scrolled through it for a while. Realized there was no porn on it and then uninstalled it.

  • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I have had every single comment of these two photos removed and threatened with a ban. They are actively trying to suppress this.

  • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    185
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Starting to think centralizing the internet into platforms owned by far-right billionaires might have been a bad idea.

  • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    217
    ·
    23 hours ago

    So the reason why Tik Tok was not allowed to run as a Chinese company, was not to prevent Chinese propaganda but to allow for US propaganda

    • wheezy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      There is an old joke about how incredibly good American propaganda was. What we are seeing now is more of a breakdown shift in the propaganda machine. It is becoming less about forming a universal belief. They have realized this is no longer possible. So, it’s not about hiding the lies. It’s about preventing the most people from seeing the truth.

      Anyway, here is the joke.

      A KGB spy and a CIA agent meet up in a bar for a friendly drink

      "I have to admit, I’m always so impressed by Soviet propaganda.

      You really know how to get people worked up," the CIA agent says.

      “Thank you,” the KGB says. "We do our best but truly, it’s nothing compared to American propaganda.

      Your people believe everything your state media tells them."

      The CIA agent drops his drink in shock and disgust. "Thank you friend, but you must be confused…

      There’s no propaganda in America."

    • OrangeSlice@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Yes, they literally explicitly said this. There also wasnt even “Chinese propaganda”, the just didn’t care to censor pro-palestine content and that’s unacceptable to the US.

      • edible_funk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        22 hours ago

        There absolutely was loads of Chinese propaganda. That you think there wasn’t is evidence that it worked too. Tiktok was a major win for China in PR and soft power.

        • OrangeSlice@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          21 hours ago

          I guess it might help if you clarify what sort of content was propaganda to you?

            • OrangeSlice@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              15 hours ago

              It isn’t though. “Propaganda” has fluid definition, so I was hoping to get on the same page so we could continue the discussion. It’s always helpful to clarify terms before we just talk past each other.


              I’m familiar with the comic, but it doesn’t represent the situation here at all. Is asking any sort of clarifying question to someone who is directly in my replies “sealioning” to you? I thought it represented an undesired and obnoxious series of questions by a third party, but I’m one of the primary participants in this conversation.

              • tomiant@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                15 hours ago

                Is asking any sort of clarifying question to someone who is directly in my replies “sealioning” to you?

                Not at all.

                But your follow up reply definitely seals the deal.

          • mrbutterscotch@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            21 hours ago

            I don’t know what the guy asking you meant exactly, but in europe tiktok has been a big reason for the rise of far right Parties all across europe. China stands to gain from a divided europe.

            • OrangeSlice@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              21 hours ago

              First part may be true, but I really don’t think you can directly blame China for that. The app itself is a tiny factor is the rise of the far right which has a lot more to do with the “in real life circumstances”.

              I would also disagree that China gains much from a divided Europe. The argument could be made in theory, but it doesn’t align with what i’ve observed From Chinese foreign policy in practice.

              The approach of amplifying divisions in other countries is more of a Russian tactic than anything. Russia stands to gain more from a divided Europe, and it would be in alignment with their foreign policy in practice. That said, I also think the Russian influence on these matters is a bit overstated at times, to the point where the actually issues aren’t being discussed. I notice it on the American side of things as well.

            • Weydemeyer@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              21 hours ago

              This is like when my mom (who is on a diet) complains that I don’t throw out the ice cream sandwiches in my freezer before she comes over to visit.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      It’s better if one of donnie’s buttboys/buttgals run every aspect of major media outlets in this country. And if they are not run directly by someone that is ideologically devoted to the felon in chief, they should at least bend the knee every once in a while and pay him tribute for their “crimes” of accurate reporting.

    • runiq@feddit.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Larry Ellison will lose billions on this.

      So what? He can generate more. Money has gravity. So does influence.

    • MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      11 hours ago

      It seems like a no-lose for aspiring oligarchs, buying a social media platform with a large enough left and/or youth user base:

      1. muck with the algorithm until what remains is a new right-wing echo chamber; or
      2. accidentally sink the whole platform, but at least you wrecked a popular place for left-wing messaging; or
      3. somehow not meaningfully change the status quo, and end up with loads of user data and ad revenue.
    • Scroll Responsibly
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      One can hope… but Twitter still exists and people were saying the same thing about that when Elmo bought it.

  • KneeTitts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    How is this NOT government censorship? How is this NOT a direct violation of everyone’s freedom of speech rights???

    edit: yes I Know tikkk tokkk is a private company, but they are doing the censorship at the direction of, and for the benefit of the white house.

    • underisk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      On March 13, 2024, the United States House of Representatives passed the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act (PAFACA) with largely bipartisan support from Democratic and Republican representatives.[21][22] It would ban operations related to the app completely within the country unless ByteDance makes a qualified divestiture as determined by the US president.

      It’s is explicitly government censorship and the power to do this was granted to the president by a bill passed under and signed by Biden (just before they lost the election)

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      I would argue it wouldn’t be a violation normally, but since the government forced the sale I’d say it is. If they can just force any platform that doesn’t play along to sell to someone who will, that’s not a free market.

    • Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      That’s the neat part, it is, but nothing matters if it isn’t enforced, and Nazis own everything

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Newest inductee to the Dead App Club.

    The fascists will descend upon it. It will turn to garbage. The only value in staying will be to study what incels are like close up.

    As an older millennial who was around when all this social media bullshit started, I’ve accepted that attending app funerals is a normal part of life and there’s always a new app to move on to. Not a big deal.

  • fyrilsol@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    105
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    Can’t say I’m sympathetic to anyone who uses TikTok, that platform has been a vacuum of people’s intelligence and attention span for years. You reap what you sow.

    • ThrowawayOnLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      With that mindset, we are all doomed. I get the desire to shit on them, just like the people who haven’t left X. But for every person who knows about the manipulation and censorship, I guarantee there’s another who’s ignorant of it, and will be shaped by it unwittingly. This is not a good thing and having that mindset only serves to allow others to get away with this.

      Tell people. Save this article and share it. Remind people of the fuckery behind the scenes whenever you get an opportunity. Be annoying about it. The people who are tuned out are the ones who need to hear it the most. Tell anyone you know using tik tok. Try convincing someone you know to quit the app. It’s better than telling them to reap what they sow. because we all lose when anyone is convinced the propaganda is real

      Trump’s whole thing is making his own reality. If you don’t challenge that reality every time he tries to lie or cheat, then it will only get worse and worse.

      • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        21 hours ago

        But for every person who knows about the manipulation and censorship, I guarantee there’s another who’s ignorant of it

        I wish it were 1:1. Probably more like 1:20.

        Tell people. Save this article and share it. Remind people of the fuckery behind the scenes whenever you get an opportunity.

        The idea is sound until you consider that people get into their own bubbles. People who avoided tiktok because they saw the imminent danger are NOT in the same space as people who are all-in. So telling the people around you is great, but 9 times out of 10 you’re going to be preaching to the choir. The vast majority who need to know will never hear, and even if they do, it will immediately be met with a response ranging from “ok boomer” to “leave me alone.”

        This is legitimately a HUGE problem, and we’re seeing lots of protests NOW because of the young people who grew up in a media environment that drove home how important values, respect, and human decency were, but given 10 or 20 years, the children who grow up in this new media landscape are going to be VERY different.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      1 day ago

      TikTok was the big left-liberal influence platform in a sea of neoliberal, conservative, and outright fascist platforms.

      But one too many Tokkers posted bad things about Israel and/or good things about Iran, Venezuela, and our immortal enemy China. So President Brandon had to shut that shit down.

      Now the US branch of the platform is back in line with the rest of US media

      • fyrilsol@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        24 hours ago

        I don’t care what political affiliation it was to be or whatever.

        It’s still all brain-drain to me.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          24 hours ago

          I mean, tell it to the folks watching CBS Evening News. Or reading the New York Post.

          For some reason, its only the newer forms of media that ever take flak as “brain rot”. As though the style carries more weight than the substance.

          • username123@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            23 hours ago

            With all due respect, I think the problem is essentially two wrongs don’t make a right. Can we have media that doesn’t suck and enough proles consume it willingly? Idk. I had hope once upon a time, but we’ve sold it hard to kids that it’s uncool to care about anything for more than 5 seconds, and the absolute coolest to fry your brain and consume only impulsive fantasy bs. Beyond that, earlier generations convinced themselves that you don’t have to think critically or feel bad about stepping on others as long as it’s what your in-group is doing. So idk what the answer is, all I’m saying is all those media options suck ass.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              22 hours ago

              Can we have media that doesn’t suck and enough proles consume it willingly?

              Definitely. The things that “suck” in media are profit engines that can only exist in parallel with the things that proles benefit by consuming. If you have a channel that’s “Oops, all ads!” your user base shrivels up into a tiny nugget of Home Shopping Channel die-hards. But if you have a channel that’s purely public services, it relies on public sponsorship (either directly through membership or indirectly through state aid). It can’t operate at a large profit or justify outside private investment to rapidly expand.

              There’s always a balancing act between content that benefits the audience and content that benefits the broadcaster.

              Beyond that, earlier generations convinced themselves that you don’t have to think critically or feel bad about stepping on others as long as it’s what your in-group is doing.

              That’s not true. That’s never been true. This isn’t an issue of generational divide. This is an issue of local communities partitioned by their access to modes of communication and the regional influence of the neighborhood’s industrial powerhouse.

              One of the most reliable indicators of a voting district’s partisan affiliation is the presence of Oil & Natural Gas industrial activity. Like, if you want to talk about why the Gulf Coast states, Ohio, and central Pennsylvania are bleeding red, it centers heavily on their enormous concentration of O&G facilities and staff. Energy sector workers are uniformly predisposed to the party that supports expanding O&G exploration, exploitation, refinement, and export.

              These people aren’t above “thinking critically”. They just see where their bread is buttered (red state plutocracy generally benefits from Oil-Friendly Republican administrations) and vote accordingly. It’s the grim math of “Do I want a five/six figure bonus at the end of the year?” which party organizers and their business allies in the state make abundantly clear during election season.

              Your problem isn’t that people don’t think critically, its that they do and the conclusions they reach aren’t favorable to your partisan allies.

          • fyrilsol@kbin.melroy.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            22
            ·
            23 hours ago

            You’re barking up the wrong tree. Here’s an idea - leave me alone.

            Actually, I’ll do you a favor and block you.

            • Sunforged@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              23 hours ago

              Replies are for the community not just the person you’re responding to. Otherwise there would just be DMs to OP.

              UnderpantsWeevil made a good point, you don’t have to take that as them wanting to debate you. You don’t even need to block them. Just stop responding, it’s not complicated.

              Then you don’t have to spend the effort being negative and we end up with communities that become a positive corner of the internet.

            • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              23 hours ago

              Do you always announce your blocks?

              “Attention everyone, i am replying to fyrilsol!”

              “Attention everyone, I am clicking the reply button!”

    • Zak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      22 hours ago

      While I do think everyone should avoid short-form video because it’s junk food for the mind, non-users have to care about it because enough people use it that it steers public opinion.

    • Flames5123@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      My girlfriend used to be on TikTok a lot. Her page was mostly trans news and gloom. It used to be a pretty far left platform like lemmy, but it’s corpo owned, so now we’re here.