Anyone who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserves neither.

Garrett can get fucked.

This feels like AI

cat

Has a respected source like the Guardian or the Boston Globe (this case is in Massachusetts, no?) done any reporting on this given the severity of the implications? Because if he did it, then his testimony is obviously incorrect, and if he didn’t do it, then he was a first hand? witness and first hand accounts have traditionally been seen as unreliable.

Starting to look like there’s a chance the husband did it and set her up to take the fall.

Do you have a reputable source for this statement?

WSJ has a bad case of MDS: Mamdani Derangement Syndrome

Scientology style speedrun when? (For legal purposes, that was a joke)

Are they going to release a theming API like they promised?

🫡😢

I would love to have one of these done of me!

Sadly it’s gone again

Counter point: ACAB includes language police.

Languages change… deal with it 😎.

Language prescriptivism?

In my Lemmy?

The best response to anyone peddling this is to quote Lyta Gould:

That’s great and all… but what if I kicked you in the balls?

…and it looks like someone already forked it

Who’s James Carville?

The CIA would like to know your location

He’s gonna declare peace in a couple of days… after he sells his oil stocks.