• fyrilsol@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    9/11

    I would’ve wanted to see what America today would become if that hadn’t happened. America had built up a lot of its reputation off the back of WW2 and was seen still as a good ally. George W Bush would not have become president for a second term because of how bad he was in office. American citizens would not be subjected to governmental survelliance to the extent it was after 9/11. And we wouldn’t have a recession that cratered the economy.

    • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      34 minutes ago

      America had already spent half a century brutalizing and terrorizing the global South exactly as it did to Iraq and Afghanistan. The idea that they were seen as good is pure revisionism

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      The US Empire grew to imperial dominance post-WWII. It was seen as a good ally only to the west. 9/11 was the excuse, not the cause of the empire’s genocide in Iraq and subsequent plunder, and the recession wasn’t caused by 9/11 either, but was a natural element of capitalism’s regular boom/bust cycle.

      With or without 9/11, the US Empire would still be a gradually dying empire hated by the world.

  • darklamer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I’d erase the bronze age collapse, my imagination runs wild thinking about what could have been if the development of civilization had continued unbroken.

    • Luizamarns@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Same here the Bronze Age collapse feels like one of those massive reset points. It’s wild to imagine how far civilization might’ve advanced if that momentum hadn’t been lost.

    • Luizamarns@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Yeah, the infamous “I didn’t inhale” era hard to imagine that even being controversial today.

  • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    When that nun destroyed Archimedes’ math book that had a bunch of pre-calculus stuff in it that wouldn’t be discovered again for centuries.

    Imagine if that book had led to the development of calculus, one of the most important tools in science for modeling the universe, much earlier than Newton and Leibniz.

    • Luizamarns@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      That loss is mind-blowing to think about. If those ideas had survived and been built on, math and science could’ve jumped ahead centuries calculus arriving that early would’ve completely reshaped how we understand the universe.

    • Luizamarns@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Truly the timeline where humanity proves it can solve even its greatest conflicts peacefully even with emus.

  • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Columbus’ return to Spain.

    His failure to return discourages further attempts for a while; and when contact is eventually made, it isn’t Spain in the immediate aftermath of the Reconquista looking to continue its momentum.

    Meanwhile, the New World is made aware of Europe and perhaps acquires some resistance to Old World diseases before any larger confrontations.

    • Luizamarns@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Interesting point! So basically, if Columbus hadn’t returned successfully, Spain’s push into the New World might’ve slowed down, giving the indigenous peoples more time to get used to European contact and maybe even build some resistance to diseases before major conflicts happened.

      • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        20 hours ago

        That, and Spain (or whoever else) wouldn’t be coming in fresh off the surrender of Granada, with the attitude that all non-Christian states must be conquered as a matter of principle.

        • Luizamarns@lemmy.todayOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Exactly without that post Granada mindset, expansion wouldn’t have been driven by the same “conquest by principle” attitude, which could’ve changed a lot of outcomes.

    • fyrilsol@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      There were no individual that invented capitalism. However, the closest individual that likely is the perpetrator to modern stage capitalism is a scottish philosopher Adam Smith.

      So, I would say him.

      I’d also include Henry Ford, who pushed for the idea of 40 hour work weeks and 5 days a week.

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Adam Smith was a political economist examining capitalism (and made several errors along the way that Marx corrected, such as utterly confusing fixed vs. circulating capital). Ford also only “pushed” for 40 hour, 5 day work weeks because worker organizing was fighting for it.

        The creation of capitalism wasn’t from an idea about a new system, but from the rise of inventions like the steam engine and industrial production leading to commodity production becoming the basis of production and distribution, as compared to more agrarian production and small manufacturers.

    • Luizamarns@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Ah yes, the legendary John Capital strikes again giving the world capitalism, whether we asked for it or not.

  • BassTurd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    18 hours ago

    There have been many horrible events, but recency bias, I would be interested in what if Hitler never came to power, there was no WWII, and no Holocaust. Would his failure to forge a path to power have prevented many of today’s happenings and not put the US as the top world power for decades, or would we still have ended up here? Israel and Palestine would likely be different, nukes wouldn’t have been dropped, and maybe the Soviet union wouldn’t have collapsed. I’m not a history guy, so maybe all of this is off base. Again, certainly worse things in history that if changed would have reshaped the world, but this is definitely not a small thing affecting us today.

    • daannii@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I think we learn from our mistakes , but only for a short time. And then we repeat them again. Seems to take about 70 years or roughly the time period for most of the population to be replaced with people who never saw the reality of that history.

      The whole world was moving towards fascism when Hitler came. That’s why he was able to run with it.

      If not him, someone else. If not Germany. Somewhere else. Fascism is inevitable when we don’t teach history properly.

      • BassTurd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Unfortunately the decision makers / lawmakers are a slimy bunch that are good at propaganda.

    • Luizamarns@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Definitely an interesting “what if.” Hitler never coming to power would have completely reshaped the 20th century no WWII, no Holocaust, and a very different global power balance. So much of today’s world, from the US as a superpower to Israel- Palestine and nuclear politics, might have played out differently. Hard to say exactly, but it’s definitely one of those pivotal moments in history.

      • BassTurd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        If Trump didn’t have a playbook I wonder if he could have accomplished the same tyranny he has.

        I’m in the US Virgin islands at the moment on a trip, and I had a good conversation with a taxi driver. Tourism is way down and they are all just as disgusted and feel just as helpless as the rest of us. It’s still a US territory, but anecdotally his shit is flinging on everyone.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Trump is a symptom of the late-stage imperialist system the US Empire is in, not a unique figure dramatically changing the course of history.

        • Luizamarns@lemmy.todayOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Yeah, even without a playbook it’s wild how much influence he’s had. Sounds rough in the Virgin Islands too crazy how his actions ripple everywhere, even in territories most people barely think about.

          • BassTurd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            17 hours ago

            It’s unfortunate and I’m embarrassed by my fellow countrymen. The US certainly has not often been on the right side of history, but in the here and now, I’m truly disgusted by it all.

    • Luizamarns@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      20 hours ago

      The Sino-Soviet split really changed the dynamics of the Cold War two communist powers, but not exactly on the same page

  • Infrapink@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    20 hours ago

    The unification of the Italian peninsula by Rome. Because fuck the Roman Empire and fuck imperialism. (Also most of what you think you hate about Christianity is stuff the early Christians inherited from Roman culture).

    • Luizamarns@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Honestly, Rome’s unification caused more harm than good. Imperialism screwed over countless people, and a lot of the “problems” people blame on early Christianity are really just Roman cultural baggage.