• TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    I honestly don’t see the issue in this headline. Should they remind everyone it’s a fake ceasefire in every headline when that’s absolutely apparent?

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        The idea seems to be that they are hiding that it’s a ceasefire violation when they explicitly are reporting a ceasefire violation.

        • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          The idea seems to be that they are hiding that it’s a ceasefire violation when they explicitly are reporting a ceasefire violation.

          This would make sense if they used the same ‘objective’ language for countries like Russia which are adversaries but they clearly don’t. If Russia did something similar all the adjectives would be in the title. And NYT wouldn’t be quoting Russia but Ukraine calling it a massive ceasefire violation.

    • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Should they remind everyone it’s a fake ceasefire in every headline when that’s absolutely apparent?

      This is literally the manufacturing consent community where shitty propaganda disguised as journalism is called out. Pretending it’s a real ceasefire that was ever respected by Israel is part of the consent manufacturing.