• Jax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    I am quoting my comment, you trog. I am literally telling you to pay attention to the thread.

    You’re intentionally obtuse and misrepresenting ‘evidence’, evidence that couldn’t be further from the discussion. A mother discussing males being a threat to females is in no way the same thing as a wannabe fascist virgin only referring to women as ‘females’ because they aren’t anything other than something to be owned and fucked.

    Hell, you can be an incel and refer to men and women as male and female. There is context here that’s important, something you willfully ignore because it directly exposes how disngenuous your argument is.

    Every further argument and retort from this point on will be met with ad hominem, because you will either recognize what I’m saying or do not deserve to be treated with respect.

    • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      You’re intentionally obtuse and misrepresenting ‘evidence’, evidence that couldn’t be further from the discussion. A mother discussing males being a threat to females is in no way the same thing as a wannabe fascist virgin only referring to women as ‘females’ because they aren’t anything other than something to be owned and fucked.

      See, you evidently accept the noun female for female humans isn’t itself sexist, because context is necessary: point proven.

      Then there’s that assumption. How do you know they’re a “a wannabe fascist virgin only referring to women as ‘females’” merely from seeing someone write female as a noun in a frivolous comment? You’re reading a tremendous amount into a few words & going after anyone over them. Where’s your context to support that?

      Your checklist seems to be: could be male ✔️ used female as a noun referring to humans ✔️, so attack.

      There is context here that’s important

      Exactly.

      you willfully ignore

      I was saying the same about you from the beginning, friend. Are you projecting?

      ad hominem

      That just confirms your irrationality. You think the words of an irrational person hurt anyone here?

      • Jax@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        16 days ago

        I’m not continuing this. Arguing for men who would use the term interchangeably with bitches is fucking baffling. I sincerely hope for your sake that you’re autistic — because the other explanations for your defense of this topic are bad. They are either; you are an incel (derogatory) or you are a very stupid woman.

        • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          15 days ago

          Arguing for men who would use the term interchangeably with bitches is fucking baffling.

          They may not be. Without firm context, you don’t know, which even you admitted: welcome to the point.

          autistic

          I admire the way autists often follow rules/logic with integrity, a severe shortcoming in some neurotypicals.

          the other explanations

          They are either; you are an incel (derogatory) or you are a very stupid woman.

          You left out the simplest explanation: you’re wrong.

          • Jax@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            15 days ago

            No, you’re applying blind empathy to people who are just misogynistic. Now I’m sure of it, you’re a limp dicked incel that’s upset he doesn’t get a free pass to hate women.

            I didn’t realize the debatelords were leaving Reddit, that’s a really bad thing — please go back.

            • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              14 days ago

              applying blind empathy

              Nope, not empathy: logic & coherence. Empathy is not a substitute for logic, and “empathy” without logic often collapses into “triggered” emotional bias that betrays itself (irrational stupidity).

              You can’t soundly argue context matters sometimes & not others as it suits you. It’s circular to assume you’re fighting misogynists and therefore claim you’re fighting misogynists. Without context, how do you know? Do you ever think it’s wrong to attack the wrong people?

              Circular reasoning & contradictions are irrational and a disservice to humanity & yourself. Keep clinging to them like a sore loser.

              • Jax@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                14 days ago

                I’m not claiming I’m fighting anyone.

                I’m telling you what is real. There are men that actively refer to themselves as men and women as female. They are misogynistic. You are either; at a learning deficit, an incel, or a bot.

                I am not arguing this with you. This is the truth. Not a single person in this thread has agreed with what you’re saying, and that does actually matter on Lemmy. Go back to Reddit.