Original reporting by the Globe & Mail is behind a paywall. In any case, it’s not a good look for Poilievre that India boosted his candidacy and then he wouldn’t get security clearance to be informed of this fact.

  • shittydwarf@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    11 个月前

    pp sure is getting a lot of foreign support, probably explains his refusal to get a security clearance. I got a security clearance to do work in police stations and evidence lockups, its very painless

  • Oderus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    11 个月前

    If Squinty McProudboy becomes PM, he’ll need his security clearance anyway and still can’t talk about certain things. How is that different from now? Literally every other political leader has their clearance and hasn’t been silenced. He’s such a fucking weasel. How can anyone believe a word he says?

    • 60d@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      11 个月前

      If he becomes PM, he just ‘gets’ security clearance.

      My understanding is that it’s required as the PM, and no PM has ever been denied due to the screening process.

      Not a Con here, but it does seem shady that he’s not in the know about anything and doesn’t want his ties publicized.

      • Oderus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 个月前

        Oh, I agree but he still can’t talk about details. He only wants to talk details when he’s opposition, not when PM. Total weasel move.

          • Oderus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 个月前

            Everyone gets to decide what we talk about. PM is no different. Pierre just can’t lie about something that has been made aware of.

            • Jamablaya@lemmy.todaybanned_from_community_badge
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              11 个月前

              There’s non disclosure rules if you aren’t the one deciding what is and isn’t secret, don’t play dumb. Fucking CSIS agent letting the globe and mail see what Poilievre couldn’t is election interference.

              • Oderus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                11 个月前

                CSIS has the same rules for all leaders. So no, it’s not election interference. Go cry elsewhere.

                • Jamablaya@lemmy.todaybanned_from_community_badge
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 个月前

                  Someone illegally released a report, to a person with no security clearance, from three years ago about a failed attempt at vote manipulation, 3 days into an federal election and you seriously think it’s not an influence attempt? Guess you weren’t playing dumb.

  • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    11 个月前

    Ah, that’s why he refused to get security clearance!

    What a scumbag. This should disqualify him from holding any position in office.

    • CanadaPlus
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 个月前

      Even without this it had no benefits for him, politically, aside from just taking away the attack that he didn’t.

  • Moose@moose.best
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    11 个月前

    I’ve been asking for years why our opposition party leader refuses to get a security clearance, or even attend briefings that Justin Trudeau had to ask CSIS to rewrite the rules of so he could also be briefed. The “liberals don’t want me speaking freely!” excuse is starting to piss me off. What’s the actual reason Pierre? Too afraid to see how foreign interference might affect your party and instead want to plug your ears about it? Or is it he just can’t get one and this speaking freely stuff just happens to be a convinient excuse? Either way, I don’t buy his reasoning as being legitimate.

    • Dtules@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 个月前

      Yeah, not a valid excuse in my mind. It shows a disturbing lack of responsibility/accountability.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 个月前

      Being in the opposition: It allows him to say whatever he wants

      Becoming PM: He gets briefed without needing it

      Pretty strategic on his part…

  • Jamablaya@lemmy.todaybanned_from_community_badge
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    11 个月前

    “Indian agents attempted to influence an election” says a CSIS agent attempting to influence an election.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 个月前

      The CSIS is trying to keep an election clear of foreign interference. It’s literally the opposite of your shit-take.

      • Jamablaya@lemmy.todaybanned_from_community_badge
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 个月前

        Bullshit, they released a non issue from years ago 3 days into a campaign. The Indian attempt wasn’t successful, and was CSIS’s job to control, not Poilievre’s.