• CanadaPlus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Political convenience is a big one with them. At least with the passenger airplanes, their only competitor is very non-American Airbus, so they’re not only too big to fail but too embarrassing to fail.

      I wouldn’t be surprised at all if in 10 years their liners regularly fall out of the sky, and the US government just covers it up domestically the way China does with a lot of their corner cutting.

      That being said, I can’t rule out that their bid wasn’t just better here, at least on paper.

      • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        Boeing has put a bunch of flight hours on the experiential version, how well that translates to a production version who knows. If LM doesn’t challenge then it’s pretty clear Boeing’s prototype was significantly better.

      • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        But then there’s still a couple of other manufacturers available, isn’t there? LM, NG… can’t think of a third one currently… Boeing would be the last place I would go to for reliable and critical engineering

        • CanadaPlus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          NG decided not to bid, actually, so it was a binary choice.