return2ozma@lemmy.world to Work Reform@lemmy.world · 8 days agoMany workers would take a pay cut to work from home — some would forgo at least 20% of their salarywww.cnbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square28fedilinkarrow-up1126arrow-down124cross-posted to: antiwork@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1102arrow-down1external-linkMany workers would take a pay cut to work from home — some would forgo at least 20% of their salarywww.cnbc.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to Work Reform@lemmy.world · 8 days agomessage-square28fedilinkcross-posted to: antiwork@lemmy.ml
minus-squareteamevil@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up22·8 days agoBullshit unless the company is making 20% less off my work suddenly…it’s a win win for business don’t let them pay less rent and you less salary.
minus-squareSpacehooks@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·8 days agoI somehow believe they get a tax cut from city or something that has to be worth more than emptying the building for 3 days.
minus-squarebitchkat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·7 days agoMy previous employer built a 2nd building in the same metro area. They got grants and stuff but they had stipulations that required a minimum number of employees to work in that office.
minus-squareSpacehooks@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 days agoYeah they could just say that and we would be less annoyed. Instead of the whole let’s ruin everyone’s day additude
Bullshit unless the company is making 20% less off my work suddenly…it’s a win win for business don’t let them pay less rent and you less salary.
I somehow believe they get a tax cut from city or something that has to be worth more than emptying the building for 3 days.
My previous employer built a 2nd building in the same metro area. They got grants and stuff but they had stipulations that required a minimum number of employees to work in that office.
Yeah they could just say that and we would be less annoyed. Instead of the whole let’s ruin everyone’s day additude