• gramxi [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 年前

    the main dev is talented but has a history of being a diva with a Galt complex. One of the reasons I’ve stuck with Mednafen aside from the goofy redditor glazing that put me off from trying duckstation in the first place.

    • edge [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 年前

      No commercial use can be pretty valid. You might not want some big company using your software.

      (Not that that applies so much to a PS1 emulator.)

      • doublepepperoni [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 年前

        Apparently some companies were modifying and packaging Duckstation in commercial products without contributing their changes back into the project which seems to be what ticked him off this time

        • merthyr1831@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 年前

          That’s kinda the point of FOSS - that free to use means free to use.

          That being said, the only times I see the downsides of this policy is when downstream messes with software on a permissive license, then doesn’t support users when the stuff they messed with fucks up - Usually Linux distros rebuilding software to use fucked up dependencies.