I can’t tell if it’s a parody or an actual genius idea.
I would like to see the debugger give a list of all these boolean values and watch them toggle in real time. That would be far more useful.
fwiw I opened an issue on the vs code repo. It already got a downvote and the issue was reassigned from one maintainer to another. Popcorn is tightly secured.
Eh, I’ll stick with C# slowly becoming more and more syntax-redundant like all the other OOPLs :'(
Previously I was able to search for “true” and “false” in my codebase. How do I do that now? VS Code has a new search interface specifically for toggles. It’s closed by default, but you can open it by clicking the “Toggle Search Toggle” toggle.
Yo dawg, I heard you liked toggles so we gave you a toggle to search for toggles in your toggle
Also, the section defining behaviour for null and undefined values are kind of bonkers.
Buuut, a nice visual nonetheless. I don’t see myself using it though.
It looks neat, but I think I’ll keep my
trueandfalse. I don’t like chhannngggeeee!I, uh, actually kind of like the idea. If you just visually converted primitives to a toggle after you type true/false, and let you delete it like any other text, it could be a small convenience on any flags you might change during the development process.
I mean this as a joke but you might be right. A quick search suggests that no one implemented something like this yet.
As long as it’s not literally a toggle that you can interact with.
I can only imagine the horrors of accidentally clicking in the editor while selecting some text and quietly changing
certificateIsValid = false;totrueor something like that.Nah, make it a keybind like alt-shift-click and give it a deafening sound like throwing an industrial breaker.
I guess it would show up in git. But yea this sounds like the new “typing my password in the tema chat”.
As a visual indicator, sure.
Oh, I could easily see a trainwreck of an implementation. But if this was just a display option like color coding keywords and variables, but you could click to change the underlying true/false? I might add it.
More technical details in the full article ;)
Beatiful. Magnificent indeed
To actual posisble implementations, it’d actually be interesting as an indicator next to the bool to make it easier to see when debugging
Ngl I dont hate it.
You know, I could find a few cases where this could have helped me troubleshoot stuff on the code.
Grep -Irn “green toggle thingy” ./*
Sounds like some condiment for the spaghetti.
Ketchup, specifically.
I used an extension a while ago that changed CSS colour values (#ababab) into little coloured dots, that became a colour picker when clicking on them (while still letting you input RGB or Hex, ofc), and it was pretty awesome!
So, I could unironically see this being really nice. Although… I think this would need a pretty narrow context, something like
if x == truewould look pretty confusing as a toggle, I imagine. But assigningx = true? Bring it on.Good point. I actually thing that having
if x == trueis bad practice anyway because it’s redundant, so showing a toggle in that context would have the benefit of highlighting that something’s wrong.
Sounds idiotic and like spaghetti code likely.
Why?
Finally, I’ve been freed from my hellish burden.
