• @goferking0
    link
    397 months ago

    On May 17, the National Park Service officially determined that park rangers and other employees cannot attend Pride festivities and parades in uniform. This decision reverses a long history of allowing such participation and even having official delegation in Pride parades across the United States. Anonymous LGBTQ+ employees report feeling betrayed and note that official Pride participation in major cities is uncertain as multiple parades finalize and applications to participate in parades remain unprocessed. The move comes amid increasing crackdowns on Pride flags and LGBTQ+ people nationwide. In most cases, Republican legislators and appointees have been behind such bans, but this time, it appears the National Park Service, led by a Biden-approved director, is restricting park participation in LGBTQ+ celebrations.

    • @whoreticulture@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      17 months ago

      Wow Biden is doing so much for the LGBT community 🥺 showing us once again that we cannot trust Democrats and solidifying radical left politics. Thanks Biden!!

  • @catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    297 months ago

    I’m surprised they allowed it at all. Usually any organization, public or private, will tell employees not to imply endorsement of anything not officially sponsored.

    I’m also surprised that Stonewall is a national monument. Apparently it was an Obama decision, so I guess it was a fuck-you to hate.

    • Are they barred from veteran’s day and St. Patrick’s Day parades as well, or does the NPS participate in those? How about 4th of July?

      Has this always been the case? If not, who was on the board that made the decision and what is their political affiliation?

      In a world where half the electorate thinks a judge must be prejudiced and has no problem with their autocratic leader saying that ethnicity decides whether someone is “fair,” I think these are legitimate followup questions.

      We needed a de-trumpification of the government. Anyone appointed by Trump or hired by an appointee should have been dismissed. This is basically what Trump is planning on doing.

      • @catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        77 months ago

        This comes from Frank Lands, who joined NPS in 2021. The director of NPS, Chuck Sams, was confirmed also in 2021. Both are from the Biden administration.

  • deweydecibel
    link
    fedilink
    English
    117 months ago

    So by the sound of it, no one is being bared from participating, and the Pride events in the parks are not cancelled, though a bunch of approvals for participation in other events are waiting on a decision.

    Just can’t use the official NPS uniforms.

    Ok. Fair enough.

    Every NPS employee should get custom shirts that state clearly who they work for. Maybe even design them to look similar to the uniforms. March in those, and leave no question who you are. Then we’ll see what happens.

    • A federal government organization is pulling back from openly supporting lgbtq+. It’s a big fuck you to the community and a big deal. Somebody decided that supporting that community was a bad look and had the power to be a dick about it.

      • @Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        117 months ago

        That somebody is Charles “Chuck” Sam’s the third, a Biden appointment and first native American to serve in the position.

    • BoscoBear
      link
      -11
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      For the same reason police shouldn’t be allowed to participate in white power marches in their uniforms. They are supposed to be neutral.

      • @Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        117 months ago

        Imagine equating hate groups associated with lynching to groups seeking equal rights and protections. You’re a clown

        • BoscoBear
          link
          -7
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Ok. Same reason firefighters are not supposed to let their kids wear their helmet while selling lemonade. They are supposed to be impartial.

        • BoscoBear
          link
          17 months ago

          That is a really good point. I need to rethink this entirely. It does seem discriminatory or at the very least highly illogical.

          I had thought of it as brand-dillutution, like making tic-tocs in your uniform but since this is a federally recognized class it really is more like wearing your uniform off-duty.

          • @whoreticulture@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            27 months ago

            And the other context you may be missing was this was encouraged for years. NPS organized to walk in SF pride, in their uniforms, for as long as I can remember. And NPS does have rules about what you can and can’t do in uniform … I wasn’t allowed to buy alcohol after work in uniform. Thanks for reconsidering your view.

            • BoscoBear
              link
              17 months ago

              While the alcohol thing seems overly draconian this seems more like “you cant use your wheelchair in uniform.” Seems begging for a lawsuit.

              • @whoreticulture@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                17 months ago

                Yeah, my point is that they have some strict rules and have chosen for years to encourage people in uniform to show up at Pride. So this was a clear choice that was made for years that has suddenly changed.

  • @tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -15
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Anonymous LGBTQ+ employees report feeling betrayed

    I don’t really see the problem. Don’t go in your National Park Service uniform and you can participate. The organization doesn’t want to get pulled into political disputes and isn’t going to want their endorsement to be implied one way or the other. The employees in question aren’t acting as spokesmen for the NPS (and if they were, then I can say that the restrictions they’d run into would be a lot more severe, like being told what they can and can’t say).

    Most people aren’t going to be wearing uniforms anyway, because their jobs don’t involve a uniform.

    That’s also not specific to the NPS or to Pride stuff. The military also has a lot of restrictions on what people can be doing politically when wearing uniform, because the military isn’t supposed to be playing in politics. It works for the public, and the public makes the political calls.

    • Withdrawing support that’s already been there in this organization is specific, actually. This wasn’t a call made by the public, it was made by the people running the org. The decision itself is political. If you think the military isn’t supposed to be political, you must have thought don’t ask don’t tell was complete BS, right? Or is it ok when it’s politically conservative?

      • @die444die@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        97 months ago

        Especially at a time when LGBTQ+ people are currently being attacked by the terrorists within our own government passing laws preventing them from getting healthcare and being able to discuss their families.

  • @unreasonabro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    -29
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I mean maybe quit fucking in the woods

    yall might think i’m joking or being whateverist but there’s a nice thicketed section of the waterfront in Toronto and there always people fucking in there. I used to bike past it on my commute, never saw any women going in. Thought it was just a nice path til I went in and was immediately propositioned. I mean I see the appeal of fucking outside but designated outdoor orgy zones are a little much

    Even that’s a little hysterical though to connect to the NPS being dickfighters I suppose.

    edit: 34 little bitches who can not read, f, u, c, k, i, n, g! one in the bush, one in the tree, one on the bus right next to me

    I didn’t realise fucking in public was this popular IRL. It’s probably not, but anyway, sorry everyone!