Sorry for the super sporadic posting. Still in the process of moving and everything. I am giving updates on my Mastodon and !stamets@lemmy.world if anyone is interested but there’s really no reason to be.

Hope everyone has a fantastic Friday. Live long and prosper, you glorious bastards.

    • @Tyfud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      269 months ago

      I’ve posted this before, but that protective boot is optional and not a part of the standard.

    • @whereisk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      149 months ago

      Probably because no one in there was using ethernet cables with snag protectors to design or test.

      In fairness, if this was targeted to medium-large corporates they would expect to be using manually terminated cables which don’t have that feature.

      I’m sure someone added that type cable to the testing procedure after this though.

    • Cowbee [he/they]
      link
      fedilink
      39 months ago

      Yea, either Cisco has shit processes that don’t involve multiple checks after drawings are first made, or multiple people fucked up in checking.

    • @fubarx@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      15 months ago

      Guessing QA test script does not specify which port to plug the ethernet cable into. So they choose whichever is closest to their dominant hand.

  • rzlatic
    link
    fedilink
    20
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    it’s the other way around. that shitty gummy piece of crap on ethernet cables is annoying as fuck, and i even haven’t had to plug it into network equipement that can be reset with it. but to reach the connector tooth under it often turns into a fight with gummy shitty ‘protector’ so i not once reached for scissors and cut that shit away.

  • @marcos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    149 months ago

    That micro-USB port isn’t great either. And the leds seem quite hard to read.

    I guess nobody fully assembled a prototype and tried to use it.

      • u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)
        link
        English
        4
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Yep, Cisco uses Mini USB. For some reason.
        (That’s used for a built-in USB to serial adapter for console access.)

        But I guess it shouldn’t be a surprise. They also chose RJ-45 for serial port instead of DB9 as usual.

          • @marcos@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            4
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            The USB symbol on the connector should be up. I think that means the wide side of a mini should be down, but I’m looking for a cable…

            EDIT: and no, the one on the device is on the correct position.

  • @tetris11@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    119 months ago

    Also: bike light manufacturers that make the button for the light impossible to feel with gloves on. Cmon, just add a bevel groove or something.

    • StametsOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      49 months ago

      I’ve not really been posting nearly as much as I normally do. Long long periods of posting fuck all, really. Have been busy packing and was showing a friend around the city for his first time here.

      • @brbposting@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        39 months ago

        Content creators on those other sites have to worry about post frequency… glad to say I don’t think folks who reshare around here are burdened with that!

        Might say I believe that strongly enough we shouldn’t apologize for taking breaks.
        Protect the Disconnect 😎