Lawyers for Donald J. Trump and his co-defendants are seeking to have Fani T. Willis disqualified, accusing her of a conflict of interest because of a personal relationship with a prosecutor she hired.

  • @TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    -45 months ago

    This has been such a disaster already.

    The singularly best shot we had at getting something to stick on Donald Trump. The one shot that couldn’t be stopped by a compromised US Supreme Court.

    Fani Willis hired a person she was in a personal relationship with, for what at least the most important trial in the country right now, and maybe what will amount the most important trial in US history. The US has never had a court case like this before, especially in the context of these being state charges. Fani Willis hired someone who is not a constitutional law specialist, a criminal prosecution lawyer, or a RICO specialist, but rather, a personal injury lawyer, as in the kind whose billboards you see going down the highway. The kind of lawyer you would hire if you were in a hit and run. Fani Willis then proceeded to take several vacations with Wade, with no receipts to show it wasn’t Wade funding these.

    There is no defending this on the part of Fani WIllis. This already represents such a miscarriage of justice she shouldn’t be allowed to continue to continue to manage what might end up being the most important court case in the modern history of the United States. Trump worked to steal the results of the GA national election. We have all the evidence we need in the public record right now. She’s done a complete disservice to the people of GA and to the people of the United States. There is no recovering and if she gave a shit about justice, she would stop defending her behavior and fix the situation, because this is so much more important than hers or her boyfriends professional or political careers.

    This was the best shot at stopping a criminal from being allowed to take the presidency the nation had, and its been bungled before the trial even got going. And not minor a bungled, but maybe broken beyond repair.

    • Avid Amoeba
      link
      fedilink
      135 months ago

      What does this relationship have to do with the case against Trump?

      • @TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        -2
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I mean if you want to pretend that public perceptions of things like court cases don’t matter, go ahead.

        Its not a good thing that before the trial has even gotten underway, the prosecution is showing what appears to be a clear cut case of corruption. Its a really bad thing that has the potential to derail the entire case (and maybe it already has?). You can hate that justice isn’t arbitrary and independent, but to deny that it isn’t is a kind of unaffordable naivete I can’t support. Public perception of how this trial is proceeding will impact its outcome. Its too bad that things are that, but here we are.

        Its a huge fucking problem and Willis is a dunce for even considering for a microsecond that this was acceptable. This was the trial of the century, and if she was so concerned about self-enrichment, she could have realized that by executing on this trial she could have set herself up in a position to be the next attorney general. Had she even considered for second the scale of what she is dealing with, she would have laughed at the hiring of, what basically amounts to an ambulance chaser, to prosecute a complex constitutional law/ RICO case. Its jaw dropping in its stupidity.

        Hiring a personal injury lawyer alone should have been enough to call into question her decision making in this case. But a personal injury lawyer that was her personal boyfriend? And she’s been taking vacations with them during the run-up to trial? She claims she paid for her half but has no receipts? And yet here we are having this discussion and the actual trial hasn’t even started yet. This is a complete disaster.

        • Avid Amoeba
          link
          fedilink
          65 months ago

          I mean, I see your point, but the question that matters is whether the jury would decide differently based on any of this. Would the jury decides to acquit Trump because of this? I don’t know, personally I don’t think so as the allegations here are completely disconnected from what the jury will be deciding on.

          • @TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            25 months ago

            Time lines matter. Mistrials matter. Wasting of public funds matter. The perception of this being seen as a witchhunt by corrupt Democrats matters. You can’t treat this in a vacuum as if what is happening around the trial doesn’t matter. Its not simply a matter of what the jury believes that matters, and their beliefs and perceptions don’t exist independently of the world that is happening around the trial.

            Fani Willis has delivered a gift to the Trump campaign and the authors of project 2025. Justice has been compromised by her actions, and if I were writing odds on justice being served in this case, I would give it 9/10 that Trump walks (because of the actions of Willis to date) in spite of having done precisely what he is accused of having done.