i wouldn’t normally be concerned since any company releasing a VR product with this price tag is obviously going to fail… but it’s apple and somehow through exquisite branding and sleek design they have managed to create something that resonated with “tech reviewers” and rich folk who can afford it.

what’s really concerning is that it’s not marketed as a new VR headset, it’s marketed by apple and these “tech reviewers” as the new iphone, something you take with you everywhere and do your daily tasks in, consume content in etc…

and it’s dystopian. imagine you are watching youtube on this thing and when an ad shows up, you can’t look away, even if you try to they can track your eye movement and just move the window, you can’t mute it, you certainly cannot install adblock on it, you are forced to watch the ad until it satisfies apple or you just give up and take out the headset.

this is why i think all these tech giants (google meta apple etc) were/are interested in the “metaverse”. it holds both your vision and your hearing hostage, you cannot do anything else when using it but to just use the thing. a 100% efficiency attention machine, completely blocking you from the outside world.

i’m not concerned about this iteration as much as people are not hyped about this iteration. just like how people are hyped about the next apple vision, i’m more worried about the next iterations with somewhat lower price tag and better software availability. i hope it flops and i know it probably won’t achieve any sort of mainstream adoption even if it’s deemed a success because it probably can’t get less bulky and look less dorky, but the possibility is still worrying. what are your thoughts?

    • @vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      40
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Google glass never actually “launched” in any meaningful sense of the word, and was a rough-as-fuck user experience.

      Ironically what did it in was the ability to record video. People were so panicked about being filmed that they started reacting violently to glass users (called glassholes). From that point on it sort of became a laughing stock. Not cool. A tainted product.

      Apple seems to have mitigated the obvious pitfalls, let’s see how it shakes out.

      • body_by_make
        link
        fedilink
        2110 months ago

        It’s funny that you don’t know what you don’t know. Google glass definitely launched, and is used by certain businesses. They went B2B instead of B2C and apparently did well enough.

      • @thehatfox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1110 months ago

        In terms of privacy in public, the Vision Pro isn’t much different from Google Glass. Both have video recording capabilities, and both displayed some form of indication when recording.

        The only real difference is that the Vision Pro is easier to spot in public due to the bulkier design.

        It will be interesting to see if there will be similar “Glasshole” reaction to the Vision Pro once they are seen in public enough.

      • @Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        510 months ago

        Not like vision peo aint also recording everything :p
        And if not for the environment travking then for their passthrough and tracking.

        And probably a shitload of telemetry.

  • nicetriangle
    link
    fedilink
    72
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Some people call VR dystopian, but it’s got great potential too.

    During COVID while I was living alone and we were under lockdown…

    I used a Quest to watch movies in a virtual theater with a bunch of people from around the world. I remember being in a theater watching an absolutely ridiculous Nicolas Cage movie laughing my ass off with a bunch of dudes from Australia. Another time I watched a cricket game with some people who explained the rules to me and kinda gave me some play by play on what was happening.

    I’ve also attended a few support group meetings in VR for coping with loss that had quite a lot of attendants. The meeting was run by a licensed group therapist and we took turns sharing and then reflecting on each others stories. It was frankly amazing.

    I also played mini golf with friends of mine as well as had a couple meetings over a round of mini golf with the other guy on my design team during lockdown. Honestly the best virtual meetings I ever had.

    All of the above were very social and very positive experience. I didn’t feel far away from people, I felt connected to them.

    Same way a smartphone can be a useful tool that enhances your life or a screen you stare at for hours consuming bullshit TikTok videos. You’re in control of what you make of it. You can also stick to a dumb phone and not participate at all.

    • @pacmondo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      1710 months ago

      Not to take away from your experience because I’m sure it was genuinely wonderful, but all I can picture for that support group is a bunch of absurd VRchat avatars sitting in a circle for a therapy session.

      • nicetriangle
        link
        fedilink
        2010 months ago

        There were no insane avatars, everyone looked pretty normal. Sorry to burst your bubble.

          • nicetriangle
            link
            fedilink
            810 months ago

            This was in Altspace VR which unfortunately got axed by Microsoft IIRC, but on there you kinda looked like a less shitty version of one of those Nintendo avatars customized however you wanted.

            The craziest anybody looked on there would be to have like rainbow or blue hair or something along those lines. It was pretty tame compared to like the furry anime cat sex doll looking things some people run around in VR Chat with. It also wasn’t overrun with screaming children which I think is VR Chat’s biggest overall problem.

            Anyway, that support group thing I think has since moved to another platform, I forget which.

  • @C4d@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4510 months ago

    People will rip off the headsets if the ads are too intrusive and annoying. Which is why they’ll either be dead subtle, or they’ll offer you paid ways to avoid them.

    I don’t think there’ll be mass adoption of this either way, mainly because it’s an expensive gadget coming at a time when folks on median incomes are feeling the pinch.

    • @bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      3710 months ago

      Which is why they’ll either be dead subtle, or they’ll offer you paid ways to avoid them.

      Apple are masters of subtle corporate propaganda. They’ve indoctrinated a generation of people to believe Android is their enemy by making their messages show up in a less readable colour in the messaging app.

      • @richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        30
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I think that’s mainly in the US, though. For the rest of the world the price tag is too high and the iPhone is the mark of the pretentious or the hipster. Or the iOS developer 😄

        The rest of us are happy with our Android phones.

      • @cheese_greater@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        1010 months ago

        The blue message shit is just peak Apple bullshit. Signal’s messages are blue to, hopefully they continue to be more popular. Its so much better in every dimension and it actually preserves one’s privacy much better

      • Nix
        link
        fedilink
        English
        410 months ago

        No one cares about the color the care about the fact that if the color is green that means sending videos will be garbage quality and they can’t reduce texts over data and can’t FaceTime or get replies in line. Which is fair because androids somehow still use sms and they finally started getting rcs with encryption and now google already started using the data for their ai

    • @thehatfox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Have you visited a website without an ad blocker recently? Because typical web advertising has become as intrusive and annoying as technically possible, and millions of people willingly accept that.

      VR/AR/Spatial Whatever has the potential to be just as bad, if not far worse.

      • Nexius_Lobster
        link
        fedilink
        410 months ago

        Have you visited a website with an ad blocker recently?

        Do you mean without an ad-blocker?

    • @daniyeg@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      110 months ago

      i mean it’s easily circumventable, “and now you don’t have to worry about losing progress on your favorite game or losing battery, because when you are not using the headset it goes to sleep mode” or whatever, but you are right if the ads are too annoying people are probably not going to use it, or will they? this is the thing i already think the way ads currently are is very intrusive but there’s a large segment of people who are fine with it. and subtle ads are way worse imagine if they constantly put ads in your peripheral vision. it’s cartoonishly evil which is why it probably won’t happen but even giving that power to them is dangerous.

  • @PunkFlame@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    2210 months ago

    I love spaceship games (think Elite: Dangerous and the like), and motorsport games. Anything where you’re set in a cockpit is a perfect candidate for VR. All I wanted was a headset that would act analagous to a dumb monitor - simply provide vision and audio and head tracking (with “simply” being a relative term - the challenges overcome and technology produced to date is, admittedly, amazing).

    But no. What we have are a bunch of privacy-invading face huggers. I shouldn’t need to sign in to anything to use a piece of hardware that should require zero internet access (which is why anything Razer is also on my do not buy list).

    So am I concerned about the Apple Vision Pro? Couldn’t give a shit to be honest. I’m not their customer.

    • @max@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      1010 months ago

      Doesn’t valve provide login-free setup and use of SteamVR for the index and the like? Granted, you’ll need a beefy PC for it, and probably some kind of storefront for most games. But at least no Facebook login strapped to your head.

      • @thorbot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        510 months ago

        It does! It can be played fully offline, doesn’t require an account, and works great with my pirated copy of elite dangerous. The index is the shit! Apple vision pro can’t do shit for me that the index has done for years now.

        • @PunkFlame@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          210 months ago

          OK @max, @thorbot, I didn’t know about this. I’d written off all VR in protest against corporate overreach. Time to do some more investigation…

          • @thorbot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            110 months ago

            The index is the GOAT, I highly recommend it if you have a powerful gaming PC to run it and are concerned about privacy

    • @jkrtn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      210 months ago

      Please let me know if you ever find one. Best I have seen are the ones without head tracking or laggy tracking.

  • BruceTwarzen
    link
    fedilink
    2210 months ago

    I’m not american and i can’t imagine a world where someone with these weird ass ski goggles don’t get laughed at.

          • @Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            310 months ago

            Precisely. Like Apple’s headset isn’t going to have lockdown and Find My features. It’s worthless stealing an iPhone now because it can easily be locked down and rendered useless.

    • @LesserAbe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      310 months ago

      People used to think someone who used a cell phone in public was a weirdo too. I remember at my high school grocery store job coworkers judging someone walking down the aisle on their phone.

    • @Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      -910 months ago

      Wow your country sounds horrible and toxic, I hope things get better and it evolves to the point where people can live their own lives without needless bullying and abuse for trivial things.

      • BaroqueInMind
        link
        fedilink
        310 months ago

        Could you imagine not having the social freedom to wear whatever the fuck you want without having someone else loudly judge you and tell you how to act?

        /u/BruceTwarzen I hope you move to a better country from that shit hole you currently reside in and heal.

        • @Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          110 months ago

          Maybe that user is still in secondary/high school and deals with that. I’m being charitable by this guess.

          The last time I thought about what I might be perceived as when in public was when I was in school… I’m old now and free to go out in public with my partner in bad dragon hoodies.

  • @ferralcat@monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    2010 months ago

    because it probably can’t get less bulky and look less dorky,

    Airpods are probably one of the ugliest pieces of tech ove seen in the last decade and yet somehow it doesn’t seem to matter. Never overestimate apple’s customer base.

    • TheRealKuni
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1310 months ago

      I don’t think they’re any uglier than other wireless earbuds. I think it’s kinda cute that they stuck with the iPod earbud look without the wires.

      Not that I have AirPods. I’m a Jabra man myself.

    • @Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      910 months ago

      They’re pretty much the only company on the planet that can push the “because your friends have one” aspect in their marketing and succeed. Apple users think they’re all part of this exclusive club and really don’t care that they’re straight up being robbed by the cost.

  • @li10@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    2010 months ago

    I mean, you can just take it off?

    Also, regarding the adoption of the headset, I think it’s absolutely crazy to say that it probably won’t get less bulky. Tech is constantly getting smaller and that will be the number one priority with the headset.

    If they can make the price and comfort level right, then I do think it becomes a mainstream product. Not saying people wear it 24/7, but that most households would have one, and it would become somewhat important for WFH and remote meetings.

    I’m not a fanboy for Apple, but personally I just think it is the tech of the (relatively) near future.

    • @daniyeg@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -4
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      it won’t get less bulky compared to phones. the headset will still need lenses, a display which itself needs to be a certain distance away from your eyes, a board for processing, a separate battery pack, audio, wifi, straps, space for some airflow so it doesn’t overheat and damage the display etc etc. small form factors have come a long way and it can probably get thinner, but i don’t think apple vision pro is that far off from the physical limit of how much smaller it can get.

      • @li10@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        1910 months ago

        Hmm, we’ll have to agree to disagree there. They can 100% decrease the size of the processing bits and reduce weight.

        I just think it’s very shortsighted to look at such an early version of the product and say “it won’t change much”. Especially when however many years ago you could have said that what we’ve got right now isn’t possible.

      • MichaelFassbendersHog [it/its]
        link
        fedilink
        710 months ago

        Disagree strongly. If there’s one sure thing in the tech world, it is the fact that electronics get smaller and smaller with each generation.

      • @thorbot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        310 months ago

        Oh, tech will just stop evolving after this point? Okay, I guess now is the time it stops. Right now.

  • @Tolstoy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2010 months ago

    Yesterday or a few days ago I’ve read that people already jailbreaked the vision. So if you must have one, you will still be able to tinker with it.

    • @DeltaWhy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      810 months ago

      Someone found a way to crash the kernel, which may or may not lead to an exploit, which would be just the first step in a long process of developing a jailbreak. I wouldn’t get too excited yet. Even if one does get released, Apple can just patch the exploit, and it could easily be years before a new jailbreakable exploit is found.

  • @BurningnnTree@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1910 months ago

    I think tech reviewers are really naive for thinking that Apple Vision Pro is the future of computing just because it was made by Apple. Nobody wants to use their computer or watch movies in VR, except for in niche situations. My prediction is that users will quickly realize that they don’t actually have any use for the Apple Vision Pro, and the product line will be discontinued.

    • oscardejarjayes [comrade/them]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1110 months ago

      I think VRChat is a pretty good counterargument to “nobody wants to watch movies in VR”. I myself don’t use VR or VRChat, but according to friends that do worlds with films are extremely popular. Maybe you think that’s a niche situation, but nobody I’ve known that’s tried it (more than a few people) has disliked it and all of them could just as easily watched it on a monitor. There are already thousands of people who sleep in VRChat, talk in VRChat, and play in VRChat. I actually know a really surprising amount of people that will sleep in virtual spaces, whether that be VRChat or just being in a Discord call.

      • ThoGot
        link
        fedilink
        210 months ago

        I actually know a really surprising amount of people that will sleep in virtual spaces, whether that be VRChat or just being in a Discord call.

        But why though

    • @thorbot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      610 months ago

      Let’s bookmark your prediction and come back in 5 years when Apple has used the data they gathered from this headset to make a proper pair of AR glasses. Absolute shit take right along side all the people who said iPhone, iPad, and Apple Watch would fail.

    • @ohlaph@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      210 months ago

      I think augmented reality will be the future. Once someone gets it, they will dominate the market.

  • Christopher Masto
    link
    fedilink
    1910 months ago

    At the risk of facts getting in the way:

    1. You can install ad blockers
    2. Apps are not able to do that
    • @Luvon@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      110 months ago

      I remember this being discussed when Apple first announced it because developers have to hand off graphics to the os so the os can do the divested rendering specifically because Apple didn’t want individual apps to be able to gather data about where users are looking.

  • @MrFunnyMoustache@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    1810 months ago

    I’m hoping to get an open source headset in the future with the opposite feature; augmented reality ad blocking for real life ads.

    I could go around the streets of any city and not see a single ad. Pair that with smart adaptive noise cancelling that would allow me to hear the outside world, but remove annoying ads or other unpleasant noises like construction tools or leafblowers.

      • @survivalmachine@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        410 months ago

        Oh, man, I would love if I could walk around my town and every billboard and annoying flashy sign were replaced with a bit of smart auto-fill or a color-matched segment of a wallpaper image from my wallpapers folder.

        • @MrFunnyMoustache@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          210 months ago

          Exactly, it can even give you functionality, like your calendar/reminders/transit schedule/ETC… There is so much potential for customisation.

      • @MrFunnyMoustache@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        210 months ago

        That would be awesome. This would also be interesting for airplane construction in the future, not having windows means the airplane will be lighter, thus saving fuel and reducing carbon emissions.

    • @Strayce
      link
      English
      210 months ago

      I mentioned this in another Apple Vision thread, but that was one of the proposed use cases for Steve Mann’s original EyeTap device.

      • @MrFunnyMoustache@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        210 months ago

        Interesting, I never heard of the EyeTap, just searched it right now. I didn’t expect someone to make something like this is 1984.

  • @SSJ2Marx@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1510 months ago

    I think that, in practice, putting a headset on is a big ask for most people. Phones caught on because they’re extremely convenient, almost everyone had a use case that was improved by a smartphone, and once they had it in their pocket it was a short hop to using the phone for other things as well. A headset though? Maybe if it was as unobtrusive as regular glasses, people would put up with it - but even then, regular glasses are so annoying that many people use contact lenses instead. So if you want to put any kind of technology on people’s head and keep it there all day, that’s where your benchmark has to be set, not way up in the same size category as a motorcycle helmet.

    • Scrubbles
      link
      fedilink
      English
      810 months ago

      Bingo. At the end of the day it’s still something massive that sits on their head. It’s going to sell well as a gimmick. But people will get tired, their necks will hurt, some will get motion sickness, and over time they’ll collect dust like all of the others.

      The fact is that vr technology is stunted until hardware can catch up, and by that I mean literally as easy as putting on sunglasses.

      • @SSJ2Marx@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        510 months ago

        AFAIK there’s some strides being made here, like I think there are see-through LCD screens that work in the lab but aren’t mass production ready, so I can see the “final form” of this being a pair of glasses with the ability to put stuff in front of your eyes and all of the actual processing is done remotely by your phone.

        …but even then, I think that lands the tech somewhere in the neighborhood of headphones, not the smartphone itself.

    • @JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      210 months ago

      My biggest concern is that everyone will eventually be forced by societal and institutional expectations; for now people can easily choose not to wear them, but if/when your employer requires it for work or if/when the only way to talk to your friends is by using it, then you won’t have much of a choice.

      For example, Zoom has very shady ties with the Chinese government (and several reports say that they’ve used it to surveil and censor people), yet many schools and workplaces required it (and many still do now). You could refuse to install/use it, but then you’d lose your job or fail your classes. It’s a similar story for TikTok, Discord, and Facebook before that.

      • WashedAnus [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1210 months ago

        I’m much more concerned about the very real and confirmed ties (see:snowden) Zoom, Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, Google, my ISP, my cell phone service provider, etc have to the security apparatus of the country I actually live in who have actual power and authority over me and a long history of murdering left wing activists.

      • @SSJ2Marx@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1110 months ago

        If you’re in America, I wouldn’t worry about the Chinese Government spying on you, and be much more worried about the American government doing it, since they can actually use what they find to prosecute you for crimes real or imagined.

        But while it is true that you could get forced into using it by social pressure, my post is about how I really don’t think that the tech has the potential for the kind of mass adoption that would create those conditions. You could be forced to use it by your job, but then when you’re not working you can take it off - compare that to the cell phone in your pocket, which they can already use to call you back into work at all hours of the day, the emails they use to get you to give them free labor outside of working hours, and the other ways in which corporations have gotten their fingers into our off time I just don’t see this as a breakthrough or a new threshold being crossed in any way.

  • FuckyWucky [none/use name]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    14
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    It’s not like they can force you to wear the headset.

    Unless of course it’s used for torture by IDF or smthn.

    • MichaelFassbendersHog [it/its]
      link
      fedilink
      410 months ago

      They sort of can! Likely, the ads will pause until you put the device back on or direct your attention back to it. Unskippable ads are rolling out on day 1, I’m betting.