ruffsl@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 2 years agoProgramming languages personified - leftoversaladleftoversalad.comexternal-linkmessage-square43linkfedilinkarrow-up1216arrow-down110cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.secomics@programming.dev
arrow-up1206arrow-down1external-linkProgramming languages personified - leftoversaladleftoversalad.comruffsl@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square43linkfedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.secomics@programming.dev
minus-squaretsonfeir@lemm.eedeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·2 years agoHow do you feel about TypeScript
minus-square🇦🇺𝕄𝕦𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕕𝕔𝕣𝕠𝕔𝕠𝕕𝕚𝕝𝕖@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down3·2 years agoU can try and polish a turd if ya want.
minus-squaretsonfeir@lemm.eedeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 years agoWell, what TYPE of turd is it? ;)
minus-squaretsonfeir@lemm.eedeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoYou better catch that.
minus-squareCanadaPluslinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·edit-22 years agoBetter. Of course, it’s just built over top, so you can still get JavaScript issues in TypeScript, and it’s not necessarily going to be obvious. This is particularly an issue if you call JavaScript libraries, which I’m told is standard practice.
minus-squareMonkderZweite@feddit.chlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 years agoA more polished unholy list of depencies?
JS, at least, deserves it.
How do you feel about TypeScript
U can try and polish a turd if ya want.
Well, what TYPE of turd is it? ;)
any
You better catch that.
Better. Of course, it’s just built over top, so you can still get JavaScript issues in TypeScript, and it’s not necessarily going to be obvious. This is particularly an issue if you call JavaScript libraries, which I’m told is standard practice.
A more polished unholy list of depencies?