• @CanadaPlus
    link
    4
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    The problem with that is that Canada has international competitors that don’t have an extra tax, and our oil is already expensive. Otherwise, I actually think this would work out about the same way. I suppose you could add tariffs to try and simulate it on American shale oil or whatever, but that would piss off trading partners and still be pretty complicated.

      • @CanadaPlus
        link
        1
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Cool, I guess. Like, not trying to be rude, and I’d respond more fully, but I’m not sure that phrase means anything.

        • @curiousaur@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          13 months ago

          It’s means that Canada should just stop trading oil. Everyone should. Like I said in my comment, everyone who puts the price of the damage into the carbon as it comes out will stop pulling it out immediately because it’s no longer profitable. Everyone extracting carbon is externalizing the cost against our future.

          • @CanadaPlus
            link
            2
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Well, you might be in your remote off-grid cabin, and willing to disconnect from the gas-powered internet backbone and grow your own food organically tomorrow, but imma level with you, I’m not. I’m going to keep burning gas until I have an alternative that I can at least survive. That means I need more of a plan than “just stop”.

              • @CanadaPlus
                link
                33 months ago

                Literally almost all people in Canada aren’t in an off-grid cabin. If you seriously are, I commend you. Sending these messages might be your only carbon footprint today.

                I personally could not afford a cabin or land, and I doubt I’m medically fit to be a sustenance farmer. I do activism, mostly, since that seems to be the main way for me to help. If I save up enough to put up panels I will.