• @maiskanzler@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    208 months ago

    It’s probably also highly automated and the staff’s job is just to watch for irregularities and alert the necessary teams.

    • ZephrC
      link
      fedilink
      23
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I mean, I’m all for giving jobs to humans and all, but isn’t monitoring a bunch of numbers and sending an alert when they go wrong one of the few things computers are actually objectively better at than humans are?

      Edit: Holy crap people. I understand that they’re probably not there for that purpose. That was the entire point I was trying to make. You don’t ALL need to point out the obvious to me.

      • gregorum
        link
        fedilink
        English
        88 months ago

        It’s because of something actually does go wrong, it might take all of them to deal with the issue and the fallout

      • Bezier
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I would assume that these people are there mainly because they know what to do if something goes wrong, instead of sitting there for easily automatable tasks.

        • Apathy Tree
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I also have to assume they probably do rotations, like watch/guard duty in the military, of control room and more active work, or it would get suuuuper boring real fast. Plus their skills would get rusty if nothing ever happened.

          But maybe I’m overly optimistic.

      • FartsWithAnAccent
        link
        fedilink
        28 months ago

        Aside from redundancy being an important safety thing, I’d guess they also have a pretty good idea what to do if something goes wrong.

      • BarqsHasBite
        link
        fedilink
        English
        08 months ago

        I think the computers do send the alert, via the screen to those people who then need to act on it.