BuddyTheBeefalo@lemmy.ml to Data Is Beautiful@lemmy.ml · 3 年前New gender gaplemmy.mlimagemessage-square402linkfedilinkarrow-up1629arrow-down1110
arrow-up1519arrow-down1imageNew gender gaplemmy.mlBuddyTheBeefalo@lemmy.ml to Data Is Beautiful@lemmy.ml · 3 年前message-square402linkfedilink
minus-squarepeople_are_cutedeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·3 年前It very literally is, in South Korea’s case.
minus-squareHawke@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·3 年前How so? Beginning to conscript women as well as men does not equate to abolishing the military, or am I missing something?
minus-squareOsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·3 年前They could conscript women, but you can imagine how hard it would be for that legislation to pass.
minus-squareExosus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down13·3 年前What? Do you want half the army shopping for new shoes to wear in the trenches while the other half has to wait for them at the shopping mall fountain?
minus-squareCowbee [he/they]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 年前Were you trying to be funny, or is that your genuine understanding of women in the millitary?
It very literally is, in South Korea’s case.
How so?
Beginning to conscript women as well as men does not equate to abolishing the military, or am I missing something?
They could conscript women, but you can imagine how hard it would be for that legislation to pass.
What? Do you want half the army shopping for new shoes to wear in the trenches while the other half has to wait for them at the shopping mall fountain?
Were you trying to be funny, or is that your genuine understanding of women in the millitary?