• @Nobody@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    The last war declared by Congress was Korea in the early 1950s in WW2. Dark Brandon doesn’t have time for this foolishness. Yemen was warned again and again. They’ve now entered the find out stage.

    edit: brain worms

    • @thisisawayoflife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      146 months ago

      The last war by US Congress was declared in June 1942, against Bulgaria, Hungary and Romania. US Congress has not made a formal declaration of war since then.

      • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】
        link
        fedilink
        9
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Right but they pass laws granting authorization of military use of force, AUMF. That’s the Congressional authority to declare war under the War Powers Clause of the Constitution.

        If you read the annotations to that clause you will see that the framers intent, traditional interpretation, and certainly modern interpretation are in agreement that the Constitution does not foreclose executive initiated use of force in what would be considered self defense, and that would certainly include the measured and limited destruction of an enemy’s ability to carry out further attacks on US interests, and would certainly cover such defensive measures when done in agreement and in concert with a broad coalition of allies.

        • @thisisawayoflife@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          -16 months ago

          Yes, we call those “blank checks” to the executive branch. The Germans even have a word for it. We did it with Vietnam and it did not go well. One would have thought the generation in Congress would have learned their lesson given most of them lived through that shitshow.

          It goes without saying that military resources can defend themselves when fired upon, there’s plenty of precedent going back well before the formation of the US. The AUMFs were not that. They were very clearly blank checks to wage literal wars anywhere the executive desired while providing the flimsiest of evidence - and Shrub did just that. See: Iraq.

          • @AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            76 months ago

            Merely an overly large check. There are limits, and we need the executive branch to be able to respond to urgent threats - the War Powers Act seems to do that.

            the 1973 War Powers Resolution, which further requires that presidents not only report to Congress within 48 hours when they deploy U.S. armed forces into hostilities without congressional authorization but also end U.S. participation in those hostilities within 60 to 90 days if Congress does not authorize it after the fact.

            Then people here are complaining about A U Military Force but I only see such a thing specifying Iraq. Iraq can’t be pulled into every possibility yeah, I agree Congress needs to get its shit together and constrain or repeal - the Iraq conflict that was created for is done.

            Meanwhile, the response to the Houthi terrorism/piracy seems exactly what these regulations provide for

              • @Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                26 months ago

                And the “terrorism” one is actually textually targeted at the perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks. It’s not even itself overly broad, it’s just been twisted into a global war on terror because the executives want to do that and no one stopped them.

                • @thisisawayoflife@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  3
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  It’s not even itself overly broad, it’s just been twisted into a global war on terror because the executives want to do that and no one stopped them.

                  Yes, therein lies the problem. It was a stupid mistake to make and those that voted for it should have known better.

          • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            36 months ago

            Go read the War Powers Act. Then tell me what decade long conflict the US has fought in without an AUMF since it was passed.

            Go on.

    • @hark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      76 months ago

      Yemen has been getting bombed by Saudi Arabia with the full backing of the US for almost a decade now, creating one of the worst humanitarian crises still ongoing. You’re right about the brain worms, but it’s not because you goofed up the last war declared by congress. Dumb Brandon is not cool for continuing the status quo with the military industrial complex.

      • @AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Does a formal declaration of war matter?

        The Wikipedia entry for the Korean War mentions Congress allocating money for the war effort within the month after US got involved. That certainly appears to be Congressional approval.

        And the US response was after a UN resolution calling for it, giving some legitimacy

    • @HorseRabbit
      link
      26 months ago

      Yemen was warned not to block the ports of a genocidial neighbour. But they just wouldn’t stop. And now the US has to bomb them. So sad.

    • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      -2
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Oh fuck off with this tired propaganda line. After Korea we did Vietnam as a “police action” and then Congress filled in the semantic loop hole with the War Powers Act. Which governs how we go to war now. If we need to fight an actual war then Congress has to pass an AUMF, Authorization to Use Military Force.

      Every action since Vietnam has either fallen into the 60 day period presidents are allowed for emergencies or an AUMF. Congress has absolutely been exercising it’s war powers. This stupid fucking lie gets trotted out by the far left and the far right for different uses and I’m done hearing it.