Police were dispatched toward Smith’s residence but were called off when they learned it was a false alarm and that everyone inside the home was safe.

Special counsel Jack Smith, who is overseeing the prosecution of former President Donald Trump in two federal cases, was the target of an attempted swatting at his Maryland residence on Christmas Day.

According to two law enforcement sources, someone called 911 and said that Smith had shot his wife at the address where Smith lives.

Montgomery County Police dispatched units toward the home but were called off when the Deputy U.S. Marshals protecting Smith and his family told police that it was a false alarm and that everyone inside the home was safe.

No arrests have been made in connection with the incident.

  • @n2burns@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    -196 months ago

    I think it’s awful, but how do you suggest making changes? The only thing I can think of is tracking 9-1-1 calls, but doing more of that discourages people from anonymously calling in emergencies, which could lead to more deaths.

    • @voracitude@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      31
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Er… What? You think they can’t or don’t already track 911 calls? How do emergency responders give where you are if you can’t actually talk while on the phone, like if you’re hiding from an intruder in your house?

      Calling in a fictional emergency needs punishment. The alternative is wasting emergency service time with impunity, having them off chasing wild geese while someone with a real emergency is dying.

      Edit: And yes, this is already illegal and has already resulted in arrests in the real world: https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/the-crime-of-swatting-fake-9-1-1-calls-have-real-consequences1

      It just needs to be enforced.

    • @seathru@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      15
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      911 calls are tracked. Listen to your local police scanner. Even if someone calls and immediately hangs up, they have a pretty good idea where that person was calling from.

      I think @MagicShel meant we should actually use the information we already have, and prosecute it like the attempted murder that it is.

        • @seathru@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Encrypted? Or digital? I thought the one here was because all you could hear was what sounded like modem static when someone keyed up. Turns out it was just a digital “encryption” that could be defeated with a $20 baofeng radio.

          There are however a few places that are straight up encrypted with their own keys, and not much you can do about that.

    • @HikingVet@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      86 months ago

      Last time I called 9-1-1 they confirmed my location, and name without me telling them who, or where I was calling from.

      9-1-1 only cares about getting help to the scene. AND, if being anonymous is an issue for you, use burners.

    • @MagicShel@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      5
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      At a minimum tell the responding officers that the call was anonymous and hasn’t been verified. I don’t know beyond that. Remove anonymity but also seal the records automatically to be unsealed only if the call itself is a crime? But we’ve had a long time to deal with this and think about solutions, and it’s hard to believe we’ve not come up with a single way to address the issue.