When the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, it claimed to be removing the judiciary from the abortion debate. In reality, it simply gave the courts a macabre new task: deciding how far states can push a patient toward death before allowing her to undergo an emergency abortion.

On Tuesday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit offered its own answer, declaring that Texas may prohibit hospitals from providing “stabilizing treatment” to pregnant patients by performing an abortion—withholding the procedure until their condition deteriorates to the point of grievous injury or near-certain death.

The ruling proves what we already know: Roe’s demise has transformed the judiciary into a kind of death panel that holds the power to elevate the potential life of a fetus over the actual life of a patient.

  • @Dagwood222@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    726 months ago

    6th Grade Biology taught us that an ‘ectopic pregnancy’ is, by definition, unviable. By their own Book, God creates ectopic pregnancies so They can have the pleasure of destroying an innocent soul.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      fedilink
      366 months ago

      That’s the thing. It’s okay when their god kills a fetus for fun. But we’re never supposed to no matter what.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          fedilink
          396 months ago

          Yes. The objective is to punish women for the crime of having sex.

        • @ChexMax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          216 months ago

          Which is absolutely insane, especially considering 1 in 4 pregnancies end in miscarriage (and that’s just confirmed pregnancies! The actual number is likely higher!)

          • @ultranaut@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            196 months ago

            From what I recall it’s actually the majority of pregnancies that end in miscarriage, it’s just that they usually occur before the woman can even really notice she was pregnant or is having a miscarriage. From the woman’s perspective she may of had a particularly unpleasant monthly period when it was actually a miscarriage. It’s one of those things no one likes to acknowledge because people find it disturbing and it completely undermines a lot of assumptions people like to make about “the miracle of life”.

            • @ChexMax@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              76 months ago

              Yes, I think if it ends in the first 4 or 5 weeks it’s considered a “chemical pregnancy” and doesn’t even count towards the stats. It’s extremely common. The whole point of not announcing your pregnancy in the first 12 weeks is because it’s so common to not make it past 12 weeks

        • prole
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Meanwhile, the backlog of untested rape kits keeps growing and growing…

          Priorities.