The use of facial recognition in this case was ‘incompatible with the ideals and values of a democratic society governed by the rule of law,’ court rules.
Facial recognition is just the tool used, the problem is the charges.
“The processing of Mr. Glukhin’s personal data in the context of his peaceful demonstration, which had not caused any danger to public order or safety, had been particularly intrusive,” the court’s decision noted.
How’s this different from a red light or speed camera?
Facial recognition is just the tool used, the problem is the charges.
Then the title is misleading click bait…