• @RaoulDook@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 year ago

        Well that’s ridiculous. What do you expect people do to, just give up the house they live in for someone else who needs a house? This isn’t Palestine, it’s the USA and we are well within our rights to keep living in the homes we paid for.

    • @SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yes, absolutely, in California. Generally, everywhere too but that’s a much broader topic.

      In California specifically, property tax costs are based on the grandfathered price of the house, which means that there are people who inherited homes bought for $30k 80 years ago and still pay that amount of property tax.

      This traps both the taxable value of the house and the land itself and keeps it from being developed, when normally someone might be priced out by the taxes a $10 million home would generally cost.

      In the State of California, real property is reassessed at market value if it is sold or transferred and property taxes can sometimes increase dramatically as a result. However, if the sale or transfer is between parents and their children, under limited circumstances, the property will not be reassessed if certain conditions are met and the proper application is timely filed.

      https://www.sfassessor.org/tax-savings/exclusions/reappraisal-exclusion-grandparent-grandchild

      It’s just one of many reasons (which is why housing costs are insane everywhere), but it is a significant contributor in California.

      Generally, the law being written to benefit homeowners is the single greatest cause of our housing crisis, and this is one element of how those laws are crafted toward existing homeowners.

      Consider: if homes are “nest eggs” that always go up in value, what is happening to the price of homes, all the time?