In nuclear chemistry elements beyond Plutonium do not occur in nature and are synthesized artificially. Is it a similar case for Higgs boson too?

If so, how does it give mass to particles if it doesn’t exist? Did scientists create Higgs at LHC in 2011 just to make sure our universe exists through some kind of circular causation?

I’m obviously not understanding this properly. Please dispel my misunderstandings with reasonable explanations!

  • @CanadaPlus
    link
    English
    15
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Particles are just a way of looking at excited quantum fields. The Higgs field is always everywhere, giving things mass.

    Honestly, depending on interpretation of quantum mechanics, you don’t need to acknowledge particles exist at all. It could all be fields becoming ever more entangled and wrinkled.

    • @Hedup@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      Photons are also bosons, right? Why do we need all the huge energy particle smashing experiment at LHC, while we can get any energy photons everywhere? What’s the difference?

      • @CanadaPlus
        link
        English
        11 year ago

        Now that is a QFT question I can’t personally answer with precision, but the gist I get is that trying to measure virtual particles is like trying to measure water molecules while submerged. Your virtual photon detector will always register virtual photons, coming from every direction. I do know every question about particle interactions has an equivalent question about field dynamics, since the discovery of the two being the same was a historical milestone (but Feynman diagrams are the easier way to keep track of what your integrals mean).

        For photons themselves, you can learn things using just the force. We’ve ruled out any significant rest mass for photons that way, because it would show up as electrostatic force penetrating conductive barriers that should (and apparently do) shield it. I guess to know the mass of a Higg’s boson, though, you need to make actual tangible particles and record their decays (in tiny, noisy increments until you narrow it down enough). There’s a lot of different moving parts in the Standard Model so it shouldn’t be too surprising it’s hard to nail down certain parameters exactly with indirect methods.