• @Wooster@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    208 months ago

    It’s kinda odd in retrospect. There are many words to describe Romulans… but violent isn’t really amongst the top ten.

    • @ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      278 months ago

      Gene Roddenberry envisaged the Romulans as Star Trek’s version of Communist China and the Klingons as its Soviet Union. In Making of Star Trek, he and Stephen Whitfield describe the Romulans as “highly militaristic, aggressive by nature, ruthless in warfare.

      That’s from the man himself. Not sure where you got the impression that romulans aren’t violent.

      • @Wooster@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        208 months ago

        I’m familiar with that part of the lore.

        It’s more like how the Borg are described as an unstoppable unrelenting all powerful force… and are stopped, relent, and are devoid of power. On paper they are one thing, on screen they are another.

        With the Romulans, they tend to outsource the violence. Pit party A against B, then clean up after. Practically scavengers. Klingons, Jem’Hadar, and Hirogen I’d more readily describe as violent.

        • ryan
          link
          fedilink
          238 months ago

          You bring up a good point. It feels like Romulans have also learned to control their violent emotions, but rather than suppress them entirely that energy is just focused all into tactics and smarter ways to be ruthless.

      • @STUPIDVIPGUY@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        28 months ago

        When I think of the Romulans, I first think of that time they plotted to bomb DS9 to gain control over the wormhole only to be thwarted by time-traveling O’Brien

    • @VindictiveJudge@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      168 months ago

      I think the police state was their solution to infighting in much the same way that Surak’s faction took up a quasi-religious adherence to logic.