• DudeBoy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -1058 months ago

    And? Did I say that wasn’t happening? Believe it or not, refusing to engage in diplomacy doesn’t make the problem go away. And they say centrists bury their heads in the sand.

    • @chuckleslord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      718 months ago

      “Centrists to fascists aren’t centrists”

      “You just label anyone as Fascist”

      “There’s a huge amount of fascists right now”

      “Irrelevant!”

      … what? I’m sorry, I can’t tell if you’re making a point or if you’re just reacting to comments as they come in. Cause that response made no sense in the greater context. I can’t even tell what point you’re trying to make at this point.

      • DudeBoy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -848 months ago

        Then let me spell it out for you.

        We, as leftists, tend to ignore authoritarians that attach themselves to our movement. I’m talking Marxists, Maoists, etc. These are people who aplogize for mass murderers. When they show up to rallies, they are welcomed. Democrat leaders cozy up to them. I see it happen regularly.

        We then turn around and accuse the right of courting facism. This is the right thing to do, but we also need to take a look in our own camp. I don’t want authoritarians of any flavor.

        • @chuckleslord@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          538 months ago

          I’m at a dead loss as to how your previous two comments relate to this at all. Maybe it’s my neurospiciness showing, but I can’t connect this thesis with your previous comments in any way.

          Also, don’t say “let me spell it out for you”, it just comes across as condescending. It’s like you’re saying it’s so obvious that this was the point you were making when I just stated my confusion on your point. My confusion is an opportunity for you to clarify, not be a dick about it.

          • @samus12345@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Apparently their argument is that left-wingers in general love tankies, which in my experience isn’t true at all.

          • DudeBoy
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -108 months ago

            Well it’s probably my own spiciness showing. I was trying to wrap too many arguments in too few comments. I tried to stave off some of the more common arguments that distract from the topic at hand by making some logical leaps. I thought it would be obvious, but I was wrong. I might have also rolled several replies into one.

            The important part is this: the idea that centrists can’t exist because the other side consists of “Nazis” is flawed. The entire spectrum of right leaning and conservative voters are not facists. In fact, most despise them as much as anyone else. The same goes for centrists, from what I have seen.

            As to your question, yes I realize that facists are being entertained the world over. I can see what Israel and Russia are doing, and I know it much more widespread than that. I just don’t think the right move is to simply alienate anyone who isn’t already on your side and wait for the fash to take over.

            And thanks for not returning my dickish energy, I was heated if you couldn’t tell.

        • @abraxas@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          198 months ago

          According to this comment, YOU should be downvoting yourself for your previous two comments.

          You straight out suggested we should be diplomatic with the Far Right.

        • @uis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          138 months ago

          We, as leftists, tend to ignore authoritarians that attach themselves to our movement. I’m talking Marxists,

          Oh. Now I see why you are downvoted to Putin’s bunker.

          • @chuckleslord@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            208 months ago

            Is that the reason? It seems more like they’re being aggressive and not explaining their positions is the reason they’re downvoted.

    • @abraxas@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      228 months ago

      “First they came for the socialists…”

      The moment someone courts Nazism or Fascism, diplomacy goes out the window for anyone worth being considered. There’s a reason the US doesn’t negotiate with terrorists, and that reason stands for fascists and other intolerant authoritarians or hate groups.

      For what it’s worth, I feel the same way about tankies. Anyone who would see me dead or censored by force does not get the right to compromise. The Republicans lost that right the moment the first innocent woman got locked in a cage post-Dobbs, if not pre-Roe in the first place.

      • DudeBoy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -58 months ago

        And how did that policy work out for us? We lost the Afghanistan war. I’m not flat out saying that your argument has no merit, I just think there is room for compromise with those who are not yet seduced by facism.

        This argument also relies on the assumption that only facists can be bigots.

        Also, I’m not saying we should compromise on all issues equally or that we can’t have our lines on the sand. But I do think there are some issues we can give a little on.

        • @abraxas@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          6
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          And how did that policy work out for us? We lost the Afghanistan war.

          I’m not sure what the Afghanistan war has to do with compromising with fascists. Could you expand your point?

          This argument also relies on the assumption that only facists can be bigots.

          No. I’ll add anyone trying to enforce government-led bigotry to the list.

          But I do think there are some issues we can give a little on.

          Look where that gets us. You open with a compromise and they say “no”. You give them 90% of what they want and they say “no”. You finally give in 100% of what they want and they STILL say “no” because it makes them look good. Then they blame you when what they get what they wanted. Just look at Obamacare (not an issue of fascism but an issue with a neofascist party). A conservative president pitching a Heritage Foundation plan got HOW MANY votes from the opposition party after making a bunch of concessions beyond Heritage Foundation? if you’re not keeping count, Republicans provided ZERO total votes for the Republican-castrated ACA. And between blaming Obamacare for everything, half the Republicans took credit for the ACA as if it weren’t the same thing they voted against.

          Fuck compromising with people who deal in bad faith.

          • DudeBoy
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -18 months ago

            Then where does that leave us? What options do we have besides completely stun locking the government? I’d honestly like to hear because that’s my major sticking point.

            The way I see it, traditional Republicans have no platform. Their platform is simply anti-democrat. This as the reason facists have taken over the party. They, on the surface, represent a solution to the GOPs lack of direction. That’s how they’re convincing moderates to vote for them, imo.

            When I say “compromise,” maybe I’m not being precise enough,that’s my fault. I don’t nessisarily mean on actual policy. I do think we need to compromise there as necessary, but I agree with you that we’ve given too much in exchange for too little. What I’m talking about is compromise in regards to how we engage in discourse.

            Yea, we need to hold GOP voters accountable if they vote for neofacists. But most arguments we are far too aggressive (much like my own earlier comments). It helps nobody and only give ammunition to the opposition. They are not courting facists, facists are courting them. I believe that this is an important distinction. It means they can still be saved from joining the cult.

            Maybe I’m being too optimistic, but I think that anyone (includong you and me) can be convinced to do horrible things if they presented in a way that exploits their existing beliefs.

            • @abraxas@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              28 months ago

              Then where does that leave us? What options do we have besides completely stun locking the government?

              Super-short-term, no options except playing HARD defensive against the bullshit. But remember the political climate right before Trump won. Republicans were convinced they needed to become more moderate, and thought Trump would be the death of their party.

              Fast-forward to the recent House shenanigans, AND THEY WERE RIGHT. All we need to do is not give into terrorists and not negotiate with anyone who doesn’t start negotiating in good-faith. If the Republicans become two parties, at some point the ones disgusted by the Alt-Right groups will have to decide that conservative Democrats are better than burning the country to the ground.

              The way I see it, traditional Republicans have no platform. Their platform is simply anti-democrat

              Traditional Republicans have the platform of regression. For 50+ years, their motto was that the New Deal was the death of the American Dream, and that if they could just reverse civil rights (and maybe the 14th Amendment) they’d be happy. It was a platform, and one we unfortunately compromised with WAY too much already.

              This as the reason facists have taken over the party. They, on the surface, represent a solution to the GOPs lack of direction. That’s how they’re convincing moderates to vote for them, imo.

              Your conclusion is correct, but I don’t think your steps are. The fascists have taken over the party because that’s what happens with conservative parties every single time. A man preaching fascism was able to steal the votes of bigots because active racism is more pleasant to the KKK than passive racism. Keeping out brown people was a HUGE voting motivation in 2016, right when we were told we were starting to overcome racism.

              Yea, we need to hold GOP voters accountable if they vote for neofacists. But most arguments we are far too aggressive (much like my own earlier comments). It helps nobody and only give ammunition to the opposition

              I understand your motivation here, but there’s a problem. Have you ever heard of “normalization”? Arguably the biggest botch in the last decade was the Joe Rogan effect, talking heads avoiding direct confrontation with idiocy until neutral observers learn it’s “okay” to take that idiocy seriously. “Blue lives matter” bullshit doesn’t just sit on tv next to other discussions, but anything even slightly extreme on the left wasn’t being given the same privilege. “Liberal media” news would spent 5 minutes talking about how BLM was all criminals perpetuating riots and then segue into how horrible Kathy Griffin was because of her joke about killing Trump.

              Every time we treat a bigot, or racist, or fascist, like their monstrous position has any hint of legitimacy, we are telling them it’s ok to be that way. Deprogramming is a complicated process (and yes, controversial in its techniques), but the one common thing is that it NEVER involves validating the person’s irrational belief. The proper first steps are to actively attack the legitimacy of whatever authority spawns their belief while showing why those opinions have no compatibility with reality. First steps because that’s never enough on its own.