• @Susaga@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    308 months ago

    I would say yes. Plants feed off of the bodies of dead lions according to this animated documentary I saw, and that doesn’t make them any less vegan. Then again, I’m not a vegan, so I might be entirely wrong.

    • Track_ShovelOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -278 months ago

      But Scavengers feed off dead bodies too. Is Hyena vegan? What about crow?

      • @Susaga@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        158 months ago

        Feeding off of dead bodies isn’t what makes it vegan or not. Plants are plants and animals are not, regardless of their diet.

        Or are you trying to argue that grass isn’t vegan?

        • Track_ShovelOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -48 months ago

          No, more that animals are harmed in the growth of a fly trap.

            • Track_ShovelOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -48 months ago

              Your double negative is throwing me for a loop.

              I also don’t get the jump from industrial Ag and wheat.

              Can you word your point differently?

              • @tofuwabohu@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                88 months ago

                Wheat is vegan, even if animals are harmed in the process of growing and harvesting it (pesticides, rodents in combine harvesters).

                Venus fly traps are vegan, even if they harmed flies.

                • Track_ShovelOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -38 months ago

                  What if the meat was harvested in a humane manner? Nitrogen asphyxiation, for instance, which is being trialed for use on humans wishing to commit suicide?

                  I’m not debating the merits current meat harvesting; on an industrial scale it’s abhorrent. I’m just mostly wanting to know where the line is drawn

                  In my case I point out above, the only real differences is that humans have a choice and animals would not (this is a big one, I will grant you) and what is ultimately consumed.

                  • lalo
                    link
                    fedilink
                    8
                    edit-2
                    8 months ago

                    The animal has a inherent will to live, there is no way to compassionately kill someone that doesn’t want to die. Euthanasia is very different because the being actually wants to die.

                  • @Ruben@feddit.nl
                    link
                    fedilink
                    68 months ago

                    I’m just mostly wanting to know where the line is drawn

                    There is no single line. People have their own principles and can think for themselves what they do and do not support, instead of just following the masses.

                    It really feels like you’re trying way too hard to “checkmate vegans”. Why do you care so much?

          • @anarchost@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            08 months ago

            Besides being cannibalism, I’m pretty sure all vegans would tell you that humans have sentience greater than, if not on par with, the average animal. So eating one would not be vegan

                • lorez
                  link
                  fedilink
                  18 months ago

                  I’m replying here cos I can’t find the comment you posted: I see humans as worthwhile as any other species but boy do we overrate ourselves. We’re the most important creature, the animal that has to be better than all the rest. We’d go without eating if that were possible. In the end what we do doesn’t matter much. Life keeps on going where it can and the spheres keep turning around.