TLDR: XFCE and Cinnamon devs are begging beginning to work on Wayland support.

  • @PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    -158 months ago

    At least the Mint devs are being realistic on the time span needed for Wayland to have a chance at working for everyone, unlike Fedora, KDE, and Gnome that are jumping the gun.

        • Bob
          link
          fedilink
          15
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Since we’re going with anecdotal evidence, I’ve been using Wayland daily for over a year and haven’t had any issues related to it

          • @Magickmaster@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            -58 months ago

            While maybe sometimes buggy, at least things run. I’m all for modernization, but if there are compatibility problems with recent software, I’m not OK with it being declared “the better, mature standard thing everybody should now use”.

    • Baut [she/her] auf.
      link
      fedilink
      8
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Wayland works pretty well, especially on GNOME. It’s good they did the jump, X11 poses unacceptable security risks for the current time.

    • @merthyr1831@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      38 months ago

      Cinnamon and XFCE are outliers in that they try to be super stable, “complete” desktops, compared to GNOME and KDE that try to be bleeding edge and packed with new and changing features.

      Benefits to both, but I can respect why Cinnamon and XFCE have been slow to adopt Wayland (to a fault, many would argue)