The Supreme Court will consider the strength of the Americans with Disabilities Act on Wednesday when it hears a dispute over whether a self-appointed “tester” of the civil rights law has the right to sue hotels over alleged violations of its provisions.

How the justices rule could have a significant impact on the practical effectiveness of the landmark legislation, which aims to shield individuals with disabilities from discrimination in public accommodations and a host of other settings.

At the center of the dispute is Deborah Laufer, a disability rights advocate who has brought hundreds of lawsuits against hotels she says are not in compliance with ADA rules requiring hotels to disclose information about how accessible they are to individuals with disabilities.

Laufer, a Florida resident who uses a wheelchair and has a visual impairment, doesn’t intend to visit the hotels she’s suing. Instead, the complaints are made in an effort to force the hotels to update their websites to be in compliance with the law. Legal experts say the strategy, known as “testing,” is necessary to ensure enforcement of the historic law.

  • @BassTurd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    99 months ago

    Do tiny independent hotels not have to comply with ADA rules? Do they get exceptions for having a noncompliant website? Whatever her motives are doesn’t matter, because what she’s doing is good for society, the ADA, and helps keep business in check. The easy solution for these hotels is to just do things right up front and not put themselves in a position to get sued.

    • @givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      29 months ago

      No, the easy solution is funding our government so they can hold businesses accountable…

      Stop trying to privatize regulation, it pretty much never works out the way it should.

      • @BassTurd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        89 months ago

        Both can exist. If there was a way to report the business to a government entity that then held the offenders liable, that would be ideal. Skip court, the business remedy the situation, the lady gets all of the changes complete. Either way, what she’s doing is a good thing and this is the best avenue to get results, and it’s working.

        • @Madison420@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          -1
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          This is quite literally why we have the rights we have. Stop trying to hand government all the power. We can have both but we need at least one means to actually be effective.