They’re still scumbags though

  • @BURN@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3091 year ago

    Nothing they do at this point will bring any of the goodwill back. They already messed up and no amount of walking it back is going to change the perception that they might just do it again at any moment

    • @nothingcorporate@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1141 year ago

      1,000%

      I’m a year into developing my first game though and this means I don’t have to abandon all the progress I’ve made. After I publish this game, all bets are off as to where I go…or should I say where I godot.

      • @gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        421 year ago

        Have you explored what level of effort it would take for you to convert it to use another engine? There are a TON of tools people are making to assist with porting projects from Unity to any number of other engines. Sure, the tools won’t do 100% of the work, but by what I’ve been hearing, they take a HUGE amount of the tedium out of the process.

          • @Aceticon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            This isn’t really useful for data heavy games such as the one I’m working on.

            It doesn’t help that Unity-specifc stuff seeps everywhere (stuff like floating point Maths, Vector classes, Time and so on) mainly because Unity themselves push people to go that way rather than use the .Net equivalents (which aren’t quite equivalent).

    • @gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      491 year ago

      And pointedly, there was no mention of acknowledgement whatsoever of their sneaky license modifications from months ago that a bunch of people discovered after the fact.

      Unity’s execs and board do not fucking care. Their opinions have not been changed. They will certainly try something just as scummy at some point in the future. It’s only a matter of time.

    • Kichae
      link
      fedilink
      151 year ago

      They don’t need good will, unfortunately. They just need devs to not abandon it for Unreal or some other engine, and the cost/benefits calculation on that is going to be made by short sighted people on a project-by-project basis.

      • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️
        link
        fedilink
        English
        311 year ago

        Which is exactly why anyone in a position to do so should still drop Unity like a hot potato, sunk cost or not. We can’t condone this kind of behavior.

      • @nous@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        161 year ago

        the engine costs several hundred million dollars to maintain

        I just don’t understand this. Godot is fairly comparable in scope and while it is behind Unity somewhat it also has a tiny fraction of the budget. Sometimes just throwing more money at a product does not make it any better any faster.

        • @aesthelete@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          26
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You’re not counting the several millions of dollars required for executive salaries yearly. Those executives are important because how else are you going to drain the life out of the developers who are actually maintaining the thing with useless meetings, bureaucracy, “cultural transitions”, and other forms of daily torment?

    • Lev_Astov
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      I won’t trust Unity with any of my future projects until I see the heads of their entire upper level management team on pikes.

      • @doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        Even that wouldn’t bring me back. There are simply other options. Godot’s good so long as you aren’t planning of a console release. If your are then Epic are no angels but they haven’t pulled this crap with Unreal.